9
$\begingroup$

I am trying to study the following function defined in terms of an integral

$$f(x) = -\int_{x}^{\infty} \sqrt{1-\frac{x^2}{k^2}}\log\left( 1- e^{-k}\right) dk$$

with $x\geq 0$. So far I was able to compute: $f(0)= \frac{\pi^2}{6}$. Using a saddle point approximation I was able to determine the asymptotic form $f(x) \approx c \frac{e^{-x}}{x^{3/2}}$ for large $x$ with $c$ a numerical constant. Moreover, I can evaluate numerically the integral and see that the function is monotonically decreasing and always positive.

I add the numerical plot between 0 and 1 for completeness

Plot of f(x) between 0 and 1

After a week of tinkering, I am tempted to give up. I am missing: 1) a form for $f$ in terms of known functions (probably this is not possible) 2) at least the series expansion of $f(x)$ in a neighborhood of $0$ a.k.a. compute $f'(0)$ and $f''(0)$.

Thank you very much for your help!

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Some integral representations

For $x > 0$ we have \begin{align} f(x) &= \int \limits_x^\infty - \log \left(1 - \mathrm{e}^{-k}\right) \sqrt{1 - \frac{x^2}{k^2}} \, \mathrm{d}k \tag{1} \\ &\!\!\!\!~\stackrel{k = x u}{=} x \int \limits_1^\infty - \log \left(1 - \mathrm{e}^{-x u}\right) \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{u^2}} \, \mathrm{d}u \tag{2} \\ &\!\!\stackrel{\text{i.b.p.}}{=} \int \limits_1^\infty \frac{\operatorname{Li}_2\left(\mathrm{e}^{-x u}\right)}{u^2 \sqrt{u^2-1}} \, \mathrm{d} u \tag{3} \\ &\!\!\!\!\!\!\stackrel{u = \cosh(s)}{=} \int \limits_0^\infty \frac{\operatorname{Li}_2\left(\mathrm{e}^{-x \cosh(s)}\right)}{\cosh^2(s)} \, \mathrm{d} s \tag{4} \\ &\!\!\!\!\!\stackrel{\tanh(s) = \tau}{=} \int \limits_0^1 \operatorname{Li}_2\left(\mathrm{e}^{-\frac{x}{\sqrt{1-\tau^2}}}\right) \, \mathrm{d} \tau \, ,\tag{5} \end{align} where $\operatorname{Li}_2$ is the dilogarithm. Apart from $(2)$ these representations are also valid for $x=0$ and yield $f(0) = \frac{\pi^2}{6}$ as expected. None of them gives much hope for a closed-form expression, but they can be used to study the asymptotic behaviour of $f$.


The expansion for $x \to \infty$

Using $(5)$ and the series representation of the dilogarithm we find $$ f(x) = \sum \limits_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^2} \int \limits_0^1 \mathrm{e}^{- \frac{n x}{\sqrt{1-\tau^2}}} \, \mathrm{d} \tau \stackrel{\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\tau^2}} = 1 + t}{=} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sum \limits_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-n x}}{n^2} \int \limits_0^\infty \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-n x t}}{\sqrt{t(1+\frac{t}{2})} (1+t)^2} \, \mathrm{d}t \, . $$ We can then employ Watson's lemma with $\lambda = -\frac{1}{2}$ and $g(t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\frac{t}{2}}(1+t)^2}$ to obtain the asymptotic expansion $$ \int \limits_0^\infty \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-n x t}}{\sqrt{t(1+\frac{t}{2})} (1+t)^2} \, \mathrm{d}t \sim \sum \limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{g^{(k)}(0) \operatorname{\Gamma}\left(k + \frac{1}{2}\right)}{k! (n x)^{k+\frac{1}{2}}} \, , \, x \to \infty \, , \, n \in \mathbb{N} \, . $$ Simplifying the gamma function we arrive at $$ f(x) \sim \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2 x}} \sum \limits_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-n x}}{n^{5/2}} \sum \limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{{{2k} \choose k} g^{(k)}(0)}{(4nx)^k} \, , \, x \to \infty \, .$$ Clearly, terms with $n > 1$ are exponentially smaller than those with $n = 1$ and may be dropped, so we find the asymptotic series $$ f(x) \sim \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2x}} \mathrm{e}^{-x} \left[1 - \frac{9}{8x} + \frac{345}{128 x^2} + \sum \limits_{k=3}^\infty \frac{{{2k} \choose k} g^{(k)}(0)}{(4x)^k} \right] \, , \, x \to \infty \, ,$$ which agrees with Robert Israel's result.


The value of $f'(0)$

Using $(3)$, $(4)$ or $(5)$ it is not hard to show that $f$ is smooth on $(0,\infty)$. The derivative at zero, however, does not exist. This can be seen by combining $(1)$ and $(2)$ to write (for $x > 0$) \begin{align} \frac{f(0) - f(x)}{x} &= \int \limits_0^\infty - \log \left(1 - \mathrm{e}^{-x u}\right) \, \mathrm{d} u - \int \limits_1^\infty - \log \left(1 - \mathrm{e}^{-x u}\right) \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{u^2}} \, \mathrm{d}u \\ &= \int \limits_0^1 - \log \left(1 - \mathrm{e}^{-x u}\right) \, \mathrm{d} u + \int \limits_1^\infty - \log \left(1 - \mathrm{e}^{-x u}\right) \left[1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{1}{u^2}}\right] \, \mathrm{d}u \\ &\geq \int \limits_0^1 - \log(x u) \, \mathrm{d} u + 0 = 1 - \log(x) \stackrel{x \to 0^+}{\longrightarrow} \infty \, , \end{align} which implies $f'(0) = - \infty$.


An idea for $x \to 0^+$

In the face this result, the expansion of $f$ at zero cannot be a simple Taylor series. Instead, we might want to use the asymptotic expansion $$ \operatorname{Li}_2 \left(\mathrm{e}^{- a}\right) = a [\log(a)-1] + \sum \limits_{k \in \mathbb{N}_0 \setminus \{1\}} \frac{\zeta(2-k)}{k!} (-a)^k = \frac{\pi^2}{6} + a \log(a) - a -\frac{a^2}{4} + \frac{a^3}{72} + \mathcal{O}\left(a^5\right) $$ of the dilogarithm for $0 < a < 2 \pi$. Naively plugging this result into $(5)$ we obtain \begin{align} f(x) &\stackrel{?}{\sim} \int \limits_0^1 \left[\frac{\pi^2}{6} + \frac{x}{\sqrt{1-\tau^2}}\left[\log\left(\frac{x}{\sqrt{1-\tau^2}}\right) -1\right] + \mathcal{O}\left(x^2\right)\right] \mathrm{d} \tau \\ &= \frac{\pi^2}{6} - \frac{\pi}{2} x \left[-\log(2 x) + 1\right] + \mathcal{O}\left(x^2\right) \, , \, x \to 0^+ \, . \end{align} While this approximation appears to be quite good numerically, it seems unlikely that it is entirely correct. The integral $\int_0^1 \frac{\mathrm{d}{\tau}}{1-\tau^2}$, which is the prefactor of the $x^2$-term, is divergent to begin with. This is probably related to the fact that the expansion is only valid for $\tau^2 < 1 - \frac{x^2}{4 \pi^2}$. I do not know (yet?) how to compute or estimate the higher-order terms rigorously, so I'll leave it at that for now.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! This was way more of what I was hoping to find! $\endgroup$ – Pietro Dona Nov 15 at 10:58
5
$\begingroup$

Write $$\ln(1-e^{-k}) = - \sum_{j=1}^\infty e^{-jk}/j$$ and take $k = x + t$ so your integral becomes $$ \sum_{j=1}^\infty e^{-jx} \int_0^\infty \frac{\sqrt{t(t+2x)}}{j(x+t)} e^{-jt} \; dt$$ Now $$ \int_0^\infty \frac{\sqrt{t(t+2x)}}{j(x+t)} e^{-jt}\; dt= \frac{\sqrt{2\pi}}{2 j^{5/2} \sqrt{x}} - \frac{9 \sqrt{2\pi}}{16 j^{7/2} x^{3/2}} + \frac{345\sqrt{2\pi}}{256 j^{9/2} x^{5/2}} + \ldots$$ so it seems to me the asymptotic form should be $$ e^{-x} \left( \frac{\sqrt{2\pi}}{2 \sqrt{x}} - \frac{9 \sqrt{2\pi}}{16 x^{3/2}} + \frac{345\sqrt{2\pi}}{256 x^{5/2}} + \ldots\right)$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your calculation. I clearly made some mistake there. $\endgroup$ – Pietro Dona Nov 14 at 20:48
2
$\begingroup$

You can try an asymptotic expansion near $x\rightarrow 0$ :

First, lets rewrite the integral as
$I(x)=x\int_1^\infty du \sqrt({1-{1\over u^2}})\log(1-e^{-xu})$,

next, we split the integral into two ranges: $u\in [1,{1\over \sqrt x}] $ and $u>{1\over \sqrt x}$ $I(x)=I_1(x)+I_2(x)=x\int_1^{1\over \sqrt x} du \sqrt({1-{1\over u^2}})\log(1-e^{-xu})+x\int_{1\over \sqrt x}^\infty du \sqrt({1-{1\over u^2}})\log(1-e^{-xu})$

Note that for $I_1$ $xu$ is always small, so an expansion can be made in $\log(1-e^{-xu})$. For $I_1$ we may consider $1/u^2$ to be small and expand in $\sqrt({1-{1\over u^2}})$.

I believe that this dual expansion will give you the behavior for $x<<1$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I will look at this as soon as I can. Thank you very much for your help! $\endgroup$ – Pietro Dona Nov 14 at 20:49
1
$\begingroup$

the work I believe that the first derivative at zero is zero, my justification is in the attached image. It basically boils down to defining a multivariate function $F(x,y)$ such that $f(x) = F(x,x)$, and computing the partial derivatives of $F$ at (0,0) on the contour x=y.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That is precisely what was bothering me. I did the same calculation but then I looked at the plot from which the derivative in 0 is clearly non 0. I added the picture to the original post. $\endgroup$ – Pietro Dona Nov 14 at 20:43
  • $\begingroup$ I thought about it a bit, I think the mistake I made was probably in computing the partial with respect to x, I let x go to zero but forgot that to have x=0, y has to go to zero too, which means that the bounds on k include 0, so the ln part explodes. So we can’t make that simplification. $\endgroup$ – Robo300 Nov 14 at 23:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.