6
$\begingroup$

I know that there is a unique semidirect product $\mathbb Z_3\rtimes(\mathbb Z_2\times \mathbb Z_2)$, defined by mapping two of the order two generators of $\mathbb Z_2\times \mathbb Z_2$ to the inversion automorphism of $\mathbb Z_3$.

However, I am not exactly sure how to proceed to show that $\mathbb Z_3\rtimes(\mathbb Z_2\mathbb \times\mathbb Z_2) \cong S_3\times\mathbb Z_2$.

What exactly is the map I could construct?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It might help to realize $S_3$ as $\Bbb Z_3\rtimes\Bbb Z_2$ so that you're left with showing $\Bbb Z_3\rtimes(\Bbb Z_2 \times \Bbb Z_2) \cong (\Bbb Z_3\rtimes\Bbb Z_2)\times\Bbb Z_2$. $\endgroup$ – Cameron Williams Nov 15 '19 at 14:16
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a good way to show that? $\endgroup$ – Vasting Nov 18 '19 at 21:53
  • $\begingroup$ This question might help. $\endgroup$ – Andrews Nov 28 '19 at 17:24
1
$\begingroup$

Let $G = S_3 \times \{\pm 1\}$ (writing the cyclic group multiplicatively).

Now map $$ G \to \{\pm 1\} \times \{\pm 1\} $$ by the rule $$ (\sigma, \epsilon) \mapsto (\epsilon \cdot \text{sign}(\sigma), \epsilon). $$ The kernel is $A_3 \times \{1\}$, so we have an exact sequence $$ 1 \to A_3 \to G \to \{\pm 1\} \times \{\pm 1\} \to 1, $$ and there is a splitting $\{\pm 1\} \times \{\pm 1\} \to G$ given by $(-1, 1) \mapsto ((12), 1)$ and $(1, -1) \mapsto (\text{id}, -1)$.

It follows that $G$ is some semidirect product of $A_3$ by $\{\pm 1\} \times \{\pm 1\}$ as desired (using $A_3 = \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$). We still must check that it is the non-trivial semi-direct product, i.e. that the lift $((12), 1)$ acts non-trivially on $A_3$ by conjugation. This is indeed true since e.g. $(12)(123)(12) \neq (123)$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ (We can say the same without talking about exact sequences: $G$ is generated by the subgroups $A_3 \times \{ 1\}$ and $\langle (12), \{\pm 1\}$; the former is normal and the intersection is trivial, so it's a semidirect product, the conjugation action is non-trivial so it's the non-trivial semidirect product.) $\endgroup$ – hunter Nov 28 '19 at 17:19
1
+50
$\begingroup$

Informally, you are looking for a central direct factor $C_2$. So how do you find that?

Name the generators, so write $Z_3 \rtimes (Z_2 \times Z_2)= \langle x \rangle \rtimes (\langle a \rangle \times \langle b \rangle)$

The semidirect product $\rtimes_\Psi$ you defined is given by mapping $\Psi: a \mapsto \phi$ and $b \mapsto \phi$ where $\phi \in \operatorname{Aut}(Z_3)$ is the map defined by $\phi(x) = x^2$. Observe now that $\Psi(ab) = \phi \phi$ and that $$\phi(\phi(x)) = \phi(x^2) = \phi(x)^2 = x^4 = x$$ that is, $\Psi(ab)=\operatorname{Id}$.

This means that $ab$ is in the kernel of $\Psi$. Having realized that, it is just a matter of changing generators for $C_2 \times C_2$, so write $$ Z_3 \rtimes (Z_2 \times Z_2)= \langle x \rangle \rtimes_\Psi (\langle a \rangle \times \langle ab \rangle)$$ and now it is clear that this is the same thing as $$(\langle x \rangle \rtimes_\Psi \langle a \rangle) \times \langle ab \rangle$$

which is $S_3 \times C_2$ (note that $Z_3 \rtimes Z_2 = S_3$).

$\endgroup$
-2
$\begingroup$

If $G$ is the group defined by the semidirect product you defined and $H$ is the direct product of $S_3\times \mathbb Z_2$, then all elements of $G$ take the form $$g=(x_1,x_2,x_3)$$ where $x_1\in\mathbb Z_3$ and $x_2,x_3\in\mathbb Z_2$. All elements of $H$ take the form $$h=(y_1,y_2)$$ where $y_1\in S_3$ and $y_2\in\mathbb Z_2$.

If I understand your definition correctly, then for the group $G$, the following should hold: $$(x_1,0,0)(a,b,c)=(x_1+a,b,c)$$ $$(x_1,1,1)(a,b,c)=(x_1+a,b+1,c+1)$$ $$(x_1,0,1)(a,b,c)=(-x_1+a,b,c+1)$$ $$(x_1,1,0)(a,b,c)=(-x_1+a,b+1,c)$$

Then you should be able to find an isomorphism between $G$ and $H$ by mapping the elements of $G$ that take the form $(x_1,0,0)$ and $(x_1,1,1)$ to elements of $H$ that take the form $(y_1,0)$ and elements of $G$ in the form $(x_1,0,1)$ and $(x_1,1,0)$ to elements of $H$ in the form $(y_1,1)$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $(y_1,0 )$ has elements of order 2, while neither $(x_1,0,0)$ or $(x_1,1,1)$ is order 2. Should it be that $(x_1,0,0)$ and $(x_1,0,1)$ take the form $(y_1,0)$? $\endgroup$ – Salmonella mayonnaise Nov 12 '19 at 4:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.