Let $(A,+,\cdot)$ be a unity ring with the property that if $x \in A$ and $x^2=0$ then $x=0$. Consider the set $M=\{a\in A | a^3=a\}$. Prove that:

a) $2a\in Z(A)$, $\forall a\in M$, where $Z(A)$ denotes the centre of the ring $A$;
b) $ab=ba$, $\forall a,b\in M$.

My attempts revolved around the fact that an idempotent element in a reduced ring is central.
So, since for $a\in M$ we have that $(a^2)^2=a^2$, it follows that $a^2\in Z(A)$, $\forall a\in M$.
The next thing I wanted to use in order to solve a) was that $Z(A)$ is a subring of $A$, so if I had proved that $(a+1)^2 \in Z(A)$, $\forall a\in M$, then we would have reached the desired conclusion. However, I couldn't prove this and I honestly doubt that it is true.
Another idea that I had was to prove that $M$ is a subring of $A$. Of course, this didn't work out because I cannot even prove that $M$ is closed under addition. Again, I don't know if this is true and it most likely isn't.
As for b), I think that a) should be of use, but I don't know how. It is a well-known problem that a ring with $x^3=x$ for any $x$ in that ring is commutative, but since $(M,+,\cdot)$ is almost definitely not a ring, this doesn't help.
EDIT: Is there any chance that this question is simply wrong? I tended to believe this before asking it here too, but since nobody has made any progress on it until now I am even more inclined to think so.

  • $\begingroup$ If you honestly doubt that $(a+1)^2 \in Z(a)$ for all $a \in M$, then you honestly doubt that part (a) is true, since if part (a) is true (and since you've already noted $a^2 \in Z(a)$ for all $a \in M$), you get $(a+1)^2 = a^2+2a+1 \in Z(a)$ for all $a \in M$. $\endgroup$ – mathworker21 Nov 9 at 18:50
  • $\begingroup$ @mathworker21 I agree with you. But since I have spent hours and hours trying to prove that $(a+1)^2 \in Z(A)$ for all $a\in M$ and nothing worked out, then I am inclined to believe that this statement may actually be wrong. Yet, since I cannot provide a counterexample, here I am, still hoping that someone better than me at rings will solve it.... $\endgroup$ – Math Guy Nov 9 at 21:34
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know. I don't think the proof that any ring with $x^3 = x$ for all $x$ implies the ring is commutative is that easy... I could imagine spending hours failing to find that proof. By the way, where did you find this problem? $\endgroup$ – mathworker21 Nov 9 at 21:35
  • $\begingroup$ @mathworker21 I know the "classical" one where $x^3=x$ for all $x$ holds in a ring, but since here we do not have a ring it doesn't really help I think. The problem is from a magazine from my country. $\endgroup$ – Math Guy Nov 9 at 21:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ you missed my point. my point was that working on these kinds of problems for hours and failing doesn't mean they are false. (Of course that is always true, but I find the statement more meaningful here). The evidence/example I gave was the $x^3=x$ problem. For that problem, I could imagine working on it for several hours without finding the solution. And of course that problem is true. $\endgroup$ – mathworker21 Nov 9 at 21:54

We show $M \subseteq Z(A)$. This immediately gives (a) and (b).

Lemma 1: $yx = 0 \implies xzy = 0$ for any $z$.

Proof: $(xzy)(xzy) = xz(yx)zy = 0$.

Lemma 2: $x^2 = x$ implies $x \in Z(A)$.

Proof: For any $y \in A$, a short computation shows $(xy-xyx)(xy-xyx) = 0 = (yx-xyx)(yx-xyx)$.

Lemma 3: $a \in M \implies a^2 \in Z(A)$.

Proof: $(a^2)^2 = a^4 = a^2$, so use Lemma 2.

Claim: For any $a \in M$, $a \in Z(A)$.

Proof: Since $(a-1)[a(a+1)]=0$, Lemma 1 implies that for any $b \in A$, $$0 = a(a+1)b(a-1) = (a^2b+ab)(a-1).$$ Also, $a(a+1)(a-1)=0$ implies $$0 = ba(a+1)(a-1) = (ba^2+ba)(a-1) = (a^2b+ba)(a-1),$$ where the last equality used Lemma 3. Subtracting gives: (1) $0 = (ba-ab)(a-1)$. The exact same argument shows: (2) $0 = (a-1)(ba-ab)$. (1) immediately implies $0 = (ba-ab)(a-1)b = (ba-ab)(ab-b)$, and (2) with Lemma 1 implies $0 = (ba-ab)b(a-1) = (ba-ab)(ba-b)$. Subtracting the two results gives $(ba-ab)^2 = 0$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you ! Could you tell me how you came up with this solution? $\endgroup$ – Math Guy Nov 10 at 11:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MathGuy well, I played around with it for a while, so I exhausted many different approaches. Then I eventually stumbled upon something like Lemma $1$, first in the form of $0 = a(a+1)b(a-1)$ and realized it started giving equations I hadn't seen/derived before. So I knew I had something good. Then it was just a matter of finishing up, which was pretty easy (the proof of the claim is rather short). $\endgroup$ – mathworker21 Nov 10 at 13:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.