Cauchy's Hypothesis or Noll's theorem states that $\vec{t}(\vec{X},t;\partial \Omega) = \vec{t}(\vec{X},t;\vec{N})$ where $\vec{N}$ is the outward unity normal to the positively oriented surface $\partial \Omega$. This translates to words as the dependence of the surface interaction vector on the surface on which it acts is only through the normal $\vec{N}$. My question is what is the significance of the semicolon (;)? How does it differ from the comma (,) used to separated the function's first two arguments?
There is no hard mathematical difference between the comma (,) and the semicolon(;).
The semicolon is used sometimes to optically separate some variable group. So the semicolon is not more than a reading aid.
The situation can be compared to the usage of different kind of parentheses, to make complex nestings more readable.
A semicolon is used to separate variables from parameters. Quite often, the terms variables and parameters are used interchangeably, but with a semicolon the meaning is that we are defining a function of the parameters that returns a function of the variables.
For example, if I write $f(x1,x2,\ldots;p1,p2,\ldots)$ then I mean that by supplying the parameters $(p1, p2,\ldots)$, I create a new function whose arguments are $(x1, x2,\ldots)$.
So the general syntax is $functionname(variables;parameters)$.
In Noll's theorem it says that the function created by supplying $\partial \Omega$ is the same as that created by supplying $\vec{N}$. That's rather a nice way of saying that the function created only depends on $\vec{N}$.
-
1I was still a little confused by the answer until I read mathsisfun.com/definitions/parameter.html – Utensil Dec 3 '17 at 11:37
