3
$\begingroup$

Suppose we have a sequence of absolutely continuous measure $\mu_n$ converges vaguely to $\mu$, which is also absolutely continuous. Generally, we have $$\int fd\mu_n \to \int fd\mu,\ \forall f\in C_B(\mathbb{R})$$ where $C_B$ stands for the space of continuous bounded functions. How to find a counterexample if we take $f$ only bounded and Borel-measurable?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

First, choose any $\varepsilon \in (0, 1)$ and define, for each $n \geq 1$, $\varepsilon_n = \varepsilon/2^{n+1}(2^n - 1)$, $$ I_{n,k} = \left( \frac{k}{2^n} - \varepsilon_n, \frac{k}{2^n} + \varepsilon_n \right) $$ and $I_n = \bigcup_{k=1}^{2^n-1}{I_{n,k}}.$ Let $\mu_n$ be the uniform distribution on $I_n$ - so that its density is just the indicator function of $I_n$ rescaled by a factor of $2^n/\varepsilon$ (the measure of this set). We first notice that the $\mu_n$ converge weakly to the uniform distribution on $[0, 1]$ - call this measure $\mu$. Indeed, take $f \in C_B(\mathbb{R})$. Since $[0, 1]$ is compact, the restriction $f|_{[0, 1]}$ is uniformly continuous. Choose then any $\delta > 0$ and there must be $n_0 \geq 1$ such that, for all $n \geq n_0$, $$ |x - y| < \varepsilon_n \implies |f(x) - f(y)| < \delta $$ whenever $x, y \in [0, 1]$. Therefore we have, for $n \geq n_0$, $$ \int{f\text{d}\mu_n} = \sum_{k=1}^{2^n-1}{ \int_{I_{n,k}}{\frac{2^n}{\varepsilon}f(x)dx} } \leq \frac{2^n}{\varepsilon}\sum_{k=1}^{2^n-1}{ 2\varepsilon_n\left( f\left( \frac{k}{2^n} \right) + \delta \right) } = \frac{1}{2^n-1}\sum_{k=1}^{2^n-1}{f\left( \frac{k}{2^n} \right)} + \delta. $$ Since a continuous function is Riemann integrable, the limit of the right side is just $\delta + \int{f\text{d}\mu}$. Since this is true for any $\delta > 0$, we get that $$ \limsup_n{ \int{f\text{d}\mu_n} } \leq \int{f\text{d}\mu}. $$ Similarly, we can also find that $$ \int{f\text{d}\mu_n} \geq \frac{1}{2^n-1}\sum_{k=1}^{2^n-1}{f\left( \frac{k}{2^n} \right)} - \delta $$ and so $$ \liminf_n{ \int{f\text{d}\mu_n} } \geq \int{f\text{d}\mu}. $$

Now, consider $f$ to be the indicator function of $I := \bigcup_{n\geq 1}{ I_n }$. Then $$ \int{f\text{d}\mu} = \mu(I) \leq \sum_{n\geq 1}{ \mu(I_n) } = \sum_{n\geq 1}(2^n - 1)\frac{2\varepsilon}{2^{n+1}(2^n-1)} = \varepsilon < 1. $$ But all measures $\mu_n$ are supported on $I_n$ and therefore $\mu_n(I) = 1$ for all $n$, showing that $\int{f\text{d}\mu_n}$ does not converge to $\int{f\text{d}\mu}$.

An interesting observation is that we couldn't find much simpler sets than $I$. By Portmanteau Theorem, if $A$ is a continuity set - i.e. $\mu(\partial A) = 0$ - then we must have $\mu_n(A) \xrightarrow{} \mu(A)$. Since we demand $\mu$ to be absolutely continuous, this includes all intervals. In this case, we can see that $\partial I = [0, 1]\setminus I$, which is a closed set of empty interior and positive measure - since $I$ itself does not have full measure on $[0, 1]$ - very similar to the fat Cantor set.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.