2
$\begingroup$

I've been given the following problem (note $T_{ord}$ is the theory of dense linear orders without endpoints):

Show that $\langle \mathbb{R}, < \rangle$ (the reals with their usual ordering) is not a saturated model of $T_{ord}$ of cardinality $\aleph_1$.

I don't think this is too terribly hard, but I'm thrown by the phrasing in light of a previous problem:

Let $M$ be a saturated model of $T_{ord}$. Show that for every $A \subseteq |M|$ such that $|A| < ||M||$ there exists $b \in |M|$ such that $M \models a < b$ for every $a \in A$.

So it seems to me that we don't need the "of cardinality $\aleph_1$" clause in the first question at all; if the reals were a saturated model of $T_{ord}$, then, eg, setting $A = \mathbb{N}$ would give us a real number $b$ larger than every natural number. So I am wondering if there's a flaw in this argument (maybe a snafu with the subtleties of $\models$ that I'm missing?) or if I'm correct that "of cardinality $\aleph_1$" is redundant here.

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Yes, the "of cardinality $\aleph_1$" here is not really relevant (it simply gives a much shorter proof in the event that $\mathbb{R}$ does not have cardinality $\aleph_1$ at all, i.e. if the continuum hypothesis is false). It is possible that the intended statement was instead that $\langle \mathbb{R}, < \rangle$ is not an $\aleph_1$-saturated model (which is equivalent to saturated if $\mathbb{R}$ has cardinality $\aleph_1$, but is stronger otherwise; in any case your proof still works thoough since $A=\mathbb{N}$ is countable).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.