0
$\begingroup$

While I understand how we can integrate the usual one-dimensional Gaussian distribution $$ I = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-(x-\mu)^2/(\sigma)^2} , $$ I'm currently struggling with its three-dimensional analogue:

$$ I = \int d^3x \mathrm{e}^{-\frac{(\vec{x}-\vec{\mu})^2}{\sigma^2}} .$$ Substituting $\vec z \equiv \frac{(\vec{x}-\vec{\mu}')}{\sigma}$ we find \begin{align} I &= \int d^3z \, \sigma \mathrm{e}^{-(\vec{z})^2} \\ &= \sigma \int dz_1 \mathrm{e}^{-(z_1)^2} \int dz_2 \mathrm{e}^{-(z_2)^2} \int dz_3 \mathrm{e}^{-(z_3)^2} \\ &= \sigma \sqrt{\pi} \sqrt{\pi} \sqrt{\pi} \\ &= \sigma \sqrt{\pi}^3 \, . \end{align} Is this correct?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

No it is not correct, the final answer should be $$ I_1^3=\sigma^3\,(\pi\cdot)^{3/2}$$, where $I_1$ is the integral in one dimension. Your idea was in principle right but you have to be more careful with the substitution, take into account that $d^3z=\frac{d^3x}{\sigma^3}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thanks! Using this modification, however, I end up with $\sigma^3 \sqrt{\pi}^3$ instead of $\sqrt{\sigma \pi}^3$. The factor $\sigma^3$ is a result of the modified norm and I don't see why it should become $\sqrt{\sigma}^3$ $\endgroup$ – jak Oct 26 '19 at 13:01
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I made a typo, you are right! I edited my answer. $\endgroup$ – Peter Oct 26 '19 at 13:03
  • $\begingroup$ awesome, thanks a lot! $\endgroup$ – jak Oct 26 '19 at 13:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.