this is NOT a question about basics of vectors in calculus or geometry. this is NOT a question about dot (inner or scalar) product. This is also not a physics problem even though the context is physics.
here is a derivation from Hallidays physics textbook. but this very derivation comes up in various situation both in mechanics and also in electromagnetism. picture is attached.
we are looking at the cross product of a position vector calleed ri (r sub i) thar points to a differential mass element mi at point P. this mass element mi is going around a circle of a radius equal to the component of ri in the xy plane. please see image please see picture.
at point P we have the vector pi (p sub i). now in the derivation it says that ri and pi are perpendicular so the sin of the angle that they make is 1. I cant wrap my head around it since ri obviously has a component in the xy plane so obvioiusly the two are not perpendicular. am i missing something about the definition of perpendicularity of two vectors?
i tried various ri and pi vectors (with diffrrent numbers) and their dot product never comes out to be zero so these are never really perpendicular going by dot product being zero as the definition of perpendicular.
in one sentence, the question is: why are ri and pi perpendicular?