4
$\begingroup$

In Werner Greub's book Linear Algebra, 4th ed. on p. 230, he gives this proof of the normal form for a skew transformation on a finite-dimensional real inner product space. (Note Greub's convention for the matrix of a transformation is the transpose of that normally used with left-hand notation.)

I believe this proof is incorrect because it is not true in general that the $a_n$ defined form an orthonormal basis of the space. For example in $\mathbb{R}^4$, if we define the transformation $\psi$ by $$e_1\mapsto e_2\qquad e_2\mapsto -e_1\qquad e_3\mapsto e_4\qquad e_4\mapsto -e_3$$ where $e_i$ is the $i$-th standard basis vector, then $\psi$ is skew and $\varphi=\psi^2=-\iota$ is diagonalized by the standard basis. If we follow the proof for this example, we get $a_1=e_1$, $a_2=\psi e_1=e_2$, $a_3=e_2$, and $a_4=\psi e_2=-e_1$, so the $a_n$ do not form a basis of $\mathbb{R}^4$.

Does anyone see a way to salvage this proof while still retaining its spirit (in particular, avoiding use of complex numbers)?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ It is perhaps worth noting that the proof presented does work in the case where each eigenvalue of $\psi^2$ has the minimal multiplicity, namely $2$. $\endgroup$ Oct 21 '19 at 3:40
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, even this is incorrect: Greub seems to be making the tacit assumption that consecutive $e_j$ are taken from the same eigenspace when possible. $\endgroup$ Oct 21 '19 at 3:46
  • $\begingroup$ Having tried googling a quick answer, I came across a growing list of errata on github that is either yours or a different blargoner's. Assuming that's you, best of luck! I would recommend that you send an email to the publisher asking whether such a list of errata already exists, if you have not done so already. $\endgroup$ Oct 21 '19 at 4:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Omnomnomnom Yep, those are mine. Thanks for your help with this proof. $\endgroup$
    – blargoner
    Oct 21 '19 at 14:13
1
$\begingroup$

One fix is to be a bit more explicit with how we deal with each non-zero eigenspace in the following way.

Suppose that $\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_d$ are the (distinct) negative eigenvalues of $\varphi = \psi^2$. Then by "the result of section 8.7" (presumably the spectral theorem for symmetric matrices), we can select eigenvectors $e_{j,k}$ such that $$ \varphi \,e_{j,k} = \lambda_j \,e_{j,k}\quad k = 1,\dots,m_j $$ That is: $m_j$ is the multiplicity of $\lambda_j$, and $e_{j,1},\dots,e_{j,m_{j}}$ is a basis of the eigenspace.

For each $\lambda_j$, we produce a new basis $\mathcal B_j$ for the eigenspace via the following recursive process. Initially, we take $S = \operatorname{span}\{e_{j,1},\dots,e_{j,m_j}\}$. We then do the following to $S$:

  • Select an arbitrary unit vector $a_1 \in S$ and define $a_2 = \frac 1{\kappa_j}\psi a_1$.
  • Add $a_1,a_2$ to $\mathcal B_j$.
  • Let $S'$ denote the orthogonal complement of $\operatorname{span}\{a_1,a_2\}$ relative to $S$. If $S' = \{0\}$, then we are done. Otherwise, $S'$ is a smaller eigenspace associated with $\lambda_j$; in this case we apply this process to $S'$.

In a proper writeup of the proof, we should prove that $a_2 = \frac 1{\kappa_j}\psi a_1$ (where $\kappa_j = \sqrt{|\lambda_j|}$) will necessarily be a unit vector from the same eigenspace, and that $a_2$ is orthogonal to $a_1$ (which Greub's text does not seem to mention); I will leave that to you.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Incidentally, we can write the non-zero part of the normal form as $$ \pmatrix{0 & \kappa_1 \\-\kappa_1 & 0 \\ && \ddots \\ &&& 0 & \kappa_p\\ &&&-\kappa_p & 0} = \pmatrix{\kappa_1 \\ & \ddots \\ && \kappa_p} \otimes \pmatrix{0 & 1\\-1 & 0} $$ where $\otimes$ denotes a Kronecker product. $\endgroup$ Oct 21 '19 at 4:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.