1
$\begingroup$

The elliptic paraboloid has height h, and two semiaxes a, b. How to find its surface area? Does it possible to use a direct formula without integrals?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The elliptic paraboloid is represented parametrically as follows:

$$x=a \sqrt{u} \cos{v}$$ $$y=b \sqrt{u} \sin{v}$$ $$z=u$$

The surface area of this object is given by

$$\int_0^h du \: \int_0^{2 \pi} dv \: \sqrt{E \,G - F^2}$$

where the 1st fundamental form is given by

$$E=1+\frac{a^2 \cos^2{v} + b^2 \sin^2{v}}{4 u}$$ $$F=\frac{1}{4} (b^2-a^2) \sin{2 v}$$ $$G = (a^2 \sin^2{v}+b^2 \cos^2{v}) u$$

The integral simplifies to

$$\int_0^h du \: \left [\sqrt{b^2 \left(a^2+4 u\right)} E\left(\frac{4 \left(b^2-a^2\right) u}{b^2 \left(a^2+4 u\right)}\right)+\sqrt{a^2 \left(b^2+4 u\right)} E\left(\frac{4 (a-b) (a+b) u}{a^2 \left(b^2+4 u\right)}\right)\right ]$$

where $E$ is the elliptic integral defined as

$$E(m) = \int_0^{\pi/2} dx \sqrt{1-m \sin^2{x}}$$

This is about the best you'll do as far as I can see.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The best but still very complex :) $\endgroup$ – Ivan Bunin Mar 24 '13 at 15:51
  • $\begingroup$ @IvanBunin: surface area is a very complex topic in general. I didn't do SA calculations for surfaces other than figures of revolution (and simple objects like cubes and prisms) until I took differential geometry. $\endgroup$ – Ron Gordon Mar 24 '13 at 15:54
  • $\begingroup$ @IvanBunin: you should at this point accept one of the solutions if you found it useful. I know you think mine is complex, but I challenge you to find something simpler. (Arc length and surface area of the ellipse are the reason the elliptic integrals have their names.) $\endgroup$ – Ron Gordon Apr 2 '13 at 13:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ When one takes the parameter $m$ as argument, you usually don't square it before multiplying by $\sin^2$; similarly, one uses the square if one is taking the modulus $k$ as the argument for the complete elliptic integral. See this for instance. $\endgroup$ – J. M. is a poor mathematician Apr 3 '13 at 6:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ At the very least, @Ron, Mathematica and A&S both use the parameter convention (which also happens to be my preference), while Maple and the DLMF use the modulus convention. So yes, care ought to be taken... :) $\endgroup$ – J. M. is a poor mathematician Apr 3 '13 at 9:51
1
$\begingroup$

The function in question is $z=\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}$.

It is more convenient to work in polar coordinates, so that $x=a r \cos \theta,y=b r\sin \theta,z=r^2$, and the parameters vary like so: $0\leq \theta \leq 2\pi,0 \leq r \leq \sqrt{h}$.

You can find the surfrace area according the the formula $A=\int_0^{2 \pi} d \theta \int_0^\sqrt{h} dr \| {\bf x}_r \times {\bf x}_\theta \|$, where ${\bf x}=(x,y,z)$. I couldn't evaluate this integral analytically.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What does $\| {\bf x}_r \times {\bf x}_\theta \|$ means? $\endgroup$ – Ivan Bunin Mar 24 '13 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ It is the norm (length) of the cross product of $\frac{\partial {\bf x}}{\partial r}$ and $\frac{\partial {\bf x}}{\partial \theta}$ $\endgroup$ – user1337 Mar 24 '13 at 16:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.