Let $f: M \to N$ be a smooth map and $(f_*)_p: T_pM \to T_{f(p)}N$ an isomorphism. Then there exists an open neighborhood $W$ of $p$ such that $f\vert_W: W \to f(W)$ is a diffeomorphism.

Here $(f_*)_p$ is the map that sends a tangent vector $[\gamma] \mapsto [f \circ \gamma]$. My notes says that this immediately follows from the inverse function theorem that I'm used to, but I don't see how it follows.

How can I prove this?


Take charts $(U_p, \phi_p)$ around $p$ and $(V_{f(p)}, \psi_{f(p)})$ around $f(p)$ in the smooth atlases of the manifolds with $f(U_p) \subseteq V_p$. We then know that $\psi_{f(p)} \circ f \circ \phi_p^{-1}$ is $C^\infty$ at $\phi(p)$. How can I proceed?

  • $\begingroup$ All you need to check is that the differential $D (\psi_{f(p)} \circ f \circ \phi_p^{-1})$ is an isomorphism at the point $\phi(p)$. Then you know that $\psi_{f(p)} \circ f \circ \phi_p^{-1}$ is a diffeo around $\phi(p)$ by the inverse function theorem. This then implies your claim (as your charts are diffeos). $\endgroup$ – Severin Schraven Oct 13 at 20:42
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I see that this is enough. But how can I link $(f_*)_p$ with the given differential? $\endgroup$ – user661541 Oct 13 at 20:52

Assume $\text{dim}\ M=\text{dim}\ N=n.$ In what follows, we use the Einstein convention for all sums.

The point is that if $(U_p, \phi_p)$ is a chart about $p$ in $M$ and $(V_{f(p)}, \psi_{f(p)})$ is a chart about $f(p)$ in $N$ then $(f_*)_p: T_pM \to T_{f(p)}N$ is a linear transformation, so it has a matrix representation in the coordinates defined by $\phi$ and $\psi$. If we can show that this matrix is the Jacobian of $\hat f:=\psi_{f(p)} \circ f \circ \phi_p^{-1}$, which is $\left(\frac{\partial \hat f^j}{\partial r^i}\right)_{ij},$ then $\hat f$ will be a local diffeomorphism, which is what we want.

But, $\textit{by definition},\ \frac{\partial }{\partial x^i}=(\phi_*)^{-1}\frac{\partial }{\partial r^i}$, where $(r^i)$ are the usual Euclidean coordinates. Similarly, $\frac{\partial }{\partial y^i}=(\psi_*)^{-1}\frac{\partial }{\partial s^i}$ where we use $(s^i)$ to represent the Euclidean coordinates in the range of $\hat f$ just to make the calculations easier to follow. For the same reason, we drop the subscripts $p$ and $f(p).$ Finally, we note that by the chain rule in $\mathbb R^n,\ \hat f_*\frac{\partial }{\partial r^i}=\frac{\partial \hat f^j}{\partial r^i}\frac{\partial}{\partial s^j},$ where the $(\hat f^j)$ are the components of $\hat f$. Then, we calculate

$f_*\frac{\partial }{\partial x^i}=f_*\circ (\phi_*)^{-1}\frac{\partial }{\partial r^i}=(f\circ \phi^{-1})_*\frac{\partial }{\partial r^i}=$

$(\psi^{-1}\circ \hat f)_*\frac{\partial }{\partial r^i}=(\psi_*)^{-1}\circ \hat f_*\frac{\partial }{\partial r^i}=$

$(\psi^{-1})_*\frac{\partial \hat f^j}{\partial r^i}\frac{\partial}{\partial s^j}=\frac{\partial \hat f^j}{\partial r^i}(\psi^{-1})_*\frac{\partial}{\partial s^j}=\frac{\partial \hat f^j}{\partial r^i}\frac{\partial}{\partial y^j}$.

It follows that the matrix of $f_*$ is the Jacobian of $\hat f,$ as desired.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.