2
$\begingroup$

I am familiar with the following Lifting Theorem:

Let $p: X \rightarrow B$ be a covering with $p(x_0) = b_0$ and let $f: Y \rightarrow B$ be a continuous map with $f(y_0) = b_0$. Assume Y is path-connected and locally path-connected. Then a lift $g$ of $f$ exists (i.e. $g: Y \rightarrow X$, $g(y_0) = x_0$ and $p \circ g = f$) if and only if $$f_*(\pi_1 (Y, y_0)) \subset p_*(\pi_1(X, x_0))$$ and in that case the lift is unique.

I know came across the following slightly different statement:

Let $p: X \rightarrow B$ be a covering with $p(x_0) = b_0$ and let $f: Y \rightarrow B$ be a continuous map with $f(y_0) = b_0$. Assume X is is connected and Y locally path-connected. If $$f_*(\pi_1 (Y, y_0)) \subset p_*(\pi_1(X, x_0))$$ then there exists a unique continuous lift $g: Y \rightarrow X$ of $f$ with $g(y_0) = x_0$ and $p \circ g = f$.

So the assumption that $Y$ is path-connected was replaced by $X$ being connected. Is the existence of the lift then still guaranteed? I know $Y$ being locally path-connected is necessary as can be seen here. But is path-connectedness of $Y$ necessary?

| cite | improve this question | | | | |
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

That will not be enough : indeed the assumption on $\pi_1(Y,y_0)$ only tells us about the path-component of $y_0$, nothing else.

To get a specific counterexample, take $X\to B$ to be the $2$-sheeted connected covering of $S^1$ (so $z\mapsto z^2, S^1\to S^1$), $b_0 = 1, x_0 = 1$; and take $Y = S^1\sqcup \mathbb R$, $y_0 = 0 \in \mathbb R$ and $f: Y\to B$ defined by $id_{S^1}$ on $S^1$ and $x\mapsto \exp(ix)$ on $\mathbb R$

Then clearly, as $\mathbb R$ is contractible, the requirement for $\pi_1(Y,y_0)$ is satisfied, but there is no lift (a lift would yield a section of the $2$-sheeted covering, which does not exist)

So unless we require more than just information about the path-component of $y_0$, path-connectedness of $Y$ is necessary

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the counterexample. I am unfortunately not familiar with sections, is there an elementary way to see that such a lift cannot exist? $\endgroup$ – EinStone Oct 13 '19 at 12:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well since you seem to know about fundamental groups : if there was a lift, restrict it to $S^1\subset Y$, you get $s: S^1\to S^1$ with $p\circ s = id_{S^1}$ where $p:z\mapsto z^2$. In particular $\pi_1(S^1,1) =(id_{S^1})*\pi_1(S^1,1) \subset p_*\pi_1(S^1,1)$, but since $p$ is a $2$-sheeted covering, $p_*\pi_1(S^1,1)$ has index $2$ in $\pi_1(S^1,1)$, so that's a contradiction $\endgroup$ – Maxime Ramzi Oct 13 '19 at 13:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.