1
$\begingroup$

A metal bar, of length $l=1$ meter and thermal diffusivity $\gamma = 2$, is taken out of a $100^{\circ}$ oven and then fully insulated except for one end, which is fixed to a large ice cube at $0^{\circ}$.

$(a)$ Write down an initial-boundary value problem that describes the temperature $u(t,x)$ of the bar at all subsequent times.

My suggestion: Suppose the bar is insulated at $x=0$, so we have \begin{align*} \dfrac{\partial u}{\partial t} = 2\dfrac{\partial^2u}{\partial x^2}, \\ \quad u(t,0) = 0, \quad u_x(t,0) = 0, \\ \quad u(0,x) = f(x) = 100 \end{align*} Is this correct? Regarding similiar problems with insulation at one end, I sometimes see examples where $u(t,1) = 0$ (or more generally $u(t,l)=0$) is included too. Should I have done the same and why? Or is my answer correct?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

If you imposed $u(t, 1) = 0$ it would have meant that the other end of the metal bar is kept at a fixed temperature, which is not what you want. The second condition has to be drawn from the fact the bar is "fully insulated". I would interpret this as an adiabatic condition, i.e., no heat exchange. Therefore, I would impose a Neumann condition to the other end of the bar, i.e., $u_x(t, 1) = 0$. These boundary conditions, together with the initial data $u(0, x) = 100$ for all $x \in [0, 1]$ make the equation well-posed.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, but why would you impose the Neumann conditions to the other end, as only one end is insulated? And why would you only insulate the other end? EDIT: Never mind! $\endgroup$
    – Maurice
    Oct 8, 2019 at 12:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, you have heat flowing inside the bar, so $u_x$ is nonzero in the interior $\endgroup$
    – G. Gare
    Oct 8, 2019 at 12:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.