Probability of full house using "license plate" method, a strange coincidence? License plate method example:
Find the number of possible combinations for a license plate in the format: [0-9][0-9][A-Z][A-Z][A-Z]  Answer: 10*10*26*26*26
I know that using C(13,2)[...]/C(52,5) is the appropriate way of determining the probability of a full house.  I found a strange outcome using the license plate method though, so please humor me.
The license plate method I used, which assumes the probability of a full house is equal to the probability of a pair * the probability of three of a kind.
[1 * (3/51)] * [1 * (3/50) * (2/49)]

In English:
Deal one card.  To create a pair, the next card must be one of the 3 remaining with the same denomination.
Deal another card.  To create three of a kind, the next card must be one of the remaining 3 with the same denomination, and the final card must be one of the remaining 2 with the same denomination.
That produces: 0.00014405762304922
The correct answer: (3744/2598960) = 0.0014405762304922
My incorrect license plate method result is exactly one order of magnitude less than the correct answer.  It's actually 10x more likely to get a full house.
My questions:


*

*Is it possible to calculate the probability of a full house using the license plate method, and if so, how?

*Is the results being off by exactly an order of magnitude a coincidence, and if not what is the correlation?


Assumptions: 52 card deck, 13 denominations, 4 suits
 A: The "license plate" method that you used found, correctly,  the probability of a full house that occurs in the order "First three of one kind, next two of another."
But the $3$ of a kind could occur in $\dbinom{5}{3}$ places, so we need to multiply the "license plate" answer that you got by $\dbinom{5}{3}$, which happens to be  $10$.  
Because of the special role $10$ plays in the decimal system, this produces a visually striking "coincidence."
The license plate idea is absolutely fine, if appropriate care is taken to make sure we really do account for all possible orders.
A: I don't think a direct license plate method will work. Let me describe the process I'd use if I wanted to do something similar to that:


*

*What is the chance that the first card will be suited to a full house? 1, of course.

*What is the chance that the second card will be suited to a full house? 1 again - chance of match is 3/51.

*What is the chance that the third card will be suited to a full house? If the first and second matched, then 1 (chance of match - 2/50). If the first and second didn't match, then 6/50.

*What is the chance that the fourth card will be suited to a full house? If all three matched, then 48/49 (1+3). If two matched, then 5/49 (2/49 for 1+3, 3/49 for 2+2).

*Fifth card? If 1+3, then 3/48 = 1/16. If 2+2, then 4/48 = 1/12.
Now, here are the possible sequences:
Card, Match, Card, 2+2, FH -> 1(3/51)(48/50)(3/49)(1/12) = 6/20825
Card, Match, Card, 1+3, FH -> 1(3/51)(48/50)(2/49)(1/16) = 3/20825
Card, Match, 3, Card, FH -> 1(3/51)(2/50)(48/49)(1/16) = 3/20825
Card, Card, Match, 1+3, FH -> 1(48/51)(6/50)(2/49)(1/16) = 6/20825
Card, Card, Match, 2+2, FH -> 1(48/51)(6/50)(3/49)(1/12) = 12/20825
Summing them up, you get 30/20825 = 6/4165 = 0.0014405762304922
