11
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be noetherian commutative ring with one, and let $f:A\to A$ be an epimorphic endomorphism of $A$.

Is $f$ necessarily an isomorphism?

("An epimorphic endomorphism" means of course "an endomorphism which is an epimorphism". In this post "ring" means "commutative ring with one", and morphisms are required to map $1$ to $1$.)


A few reminders:

A morphism of rings $f:A\to B$ is an epimorphism if for all pairs of morphisms $(g,h):B\rightrightarrows C$ the equality $g\circ f=h\circ f$ implies $g=h$. Surjective morphisms are epimorphic, but the converse does not hold: for instance the inclusion $\mathbb Z\to\mathbb Q$ is an epimorphism.

If $A$ is noetherian and $f:A\to A$ is a surjective endomorphism, then $f$ is an isomorphism, because if $f$ were not injective, then the kernels of the iterated endomorphisms $f^n$ would form an ascending chain of ideals of $A$.

If $A$ is a nonzero ring, then the map $(a_1,a_2,\dots)\to(a_2,a_3,\dots)$ is a surjective endomorphism of $B:=A\times A\times\cdots$ which is not an isomorphism (but of course $B$ is not noetherian).


A few links:

MathOverflow thread What do epimorphisms of (commutative) rings look like?.

Stacks Project Section Epimorphisms of rings.

Samuel Seminar . See in particular Section 2 of Exposé Number 7 by Daniel Ferrand.

$\endgroup$
12
$\begingroup$

No. For instance, let $A=\mathbb{Z}[x,x^{-1},(x+1)^{-1},(x+2)^{-1},\dots]$. Then $A$ is Noetherian, since it is a localization of $\mathbb{Z}[x]$. Now consider the homomorphism $f:A\to A$ which maps $x$ to $x+1$. The image of $f$ is $B=\mathbb{Z}[x,(x+1)^{-1},(x+2)^{-1},\dots]$ and in particular $f$ is not surjective since the image does not contain $x^{-1}$. But $f$ is epimorphic, since $A$ is a localization of $B$ (just invert $x$).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.