0
$\begingroup$

While studying weakly compact operators the book proves that every compact operator is weakly compact and also that every weakly compact operator is bounded, I got it, ad they conclude those results place weak compactness between compactness and boundedness as a property for linear operators between Banach spaces.

As counterexamples they say the identity operator in $l_1$ is a bounded operator ( I can see this) but isn't weakly compact (not so sure how to prove that) and that the identity operator in $l_2$ is weakly compact (why?) but isn't bounded.

The definition for a weakly compact operator is the following:

Let X,Y be Banach spaces, we say $T:X\longrightarrow Y$ is weakly compact, if for every bounded set $B\subset X$ , $T(B)$ is relatively weakly subset of $Y$.

Any guide in how to prove this? I don't want the full answer, thank you.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

First, to prove (weak) compactness of an operator $T:X \rightarrow Y$, you just need to show that $T(B_X)$ is relatively (weakly) compact in $Y$.

I will first comment on the $\ell_2$ case. I think you meant that the identity operator on $\ell_2$ is weakly compact but not compact (as it is obviously bounded). So I will show that.

As $I(B_{\ell_2}) = B_{\ell_2}$, $I$ cannot be compact since $\ell_2$ is infinite-dimensional. However, $\ell_2$ is a Hilbert space and hence reflexive, so $B_{\ell_2}$ is weakly compact by Banach-Alaoglu theorem and $I$ is weakly compact.

The $\ell_1$ case is similar. $I$ is obviously bounded but $B_{\ell_1}$ is not weakly compact as $\ell_1$ is not reflexive, therefore $I$ is not even weakly compact.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, the identity in $l_2$ isn't compact. Thank you now I got it. $\endgroup$ – ipreferpi Sep 27 '19 at 20:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.