0
$\begingroup$

I am trying to understand the proof of the Sylvesters Criterion. More concretely:

Suppose that the real symmetric matrix $A$ has only positive principal minors.

The statement that I do not understand says: "It follows that if $A$ is not positive definite, it must possess at least two negative eigenvalues.". Why can't $A$ just have one negative eigenvalue? I would be very grateful if somebody could explain this or give me a good source to read through.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Why is that? I am trying to prove that it cannot be non positiv definite. And to my knowledge a positive definite matrix has only positive eigenvalues. $\endgroup$ – Pablo Jeken Sep 25 '19 at 16:19
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry I mean that the statement you are reffering to "It follows that if A is not positive definite, it must possess at least two negative eigenvalues" is uncorrect. $\endgroup$ – user Sep 25 '19 at 16:30
  • $\begingroup$ The $0$ is missing right? It could be semidefinite... $\endgroup$ – Pablo Jeken Sep 25 '19 at 16:36
  • $\begingroup$ If "A is not positive definite" of course it can also have only one negative eigenvalue. $\endgroup$ – user Sep 25 '19 at 16:47
  • $\begingroup$ Well, as @flawr has shown for $det(A)>0$ it is clear that a non positive definite matrix has to have at least two negative eigenvalues. Moreover it can just have an even amount of negative eigenvalues, otherwise $det(A)<0$. $\endgroup$ – Pablo Jeken Sep 25 '19 at 17:47
3
$\begingroup$

We know that $\det(A) > 0$. Recall that $\det(A) = \prod_i \lambda_i$ where $\lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $A$. Then we cannot just have one negative eigenvalue if $A$ has a positive determinant.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I stumbled upon a further small question regarding the same proof. By showing that the last entry of a vector is not accountable for a negative result of $v^T Av$, the author states: "Hence the leading $(n−1)×(n−1)$ principal submatrix of A is not positive definitive." Why is that so? (author is inacive). $\endgroup$ – Pablo Jeken Sep 25 '19 at 17:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Let us write $A = \begin{bmatrix} A' & a \\ a^* & a_{nn} \end{bmatrix}$ where $A'$ is th leading principal $(n-1)\times(n-1)$ submatrix and let us write $u = \begin{bmatrix} w \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}.$ Then $0 > u^* A u = u^* \begin{bmatrix} A' w + 0a \\ a^* w + 0a_{nn}\end{bmatrix} = w^* (A' a +0a) + 0(a^*w + 0a_{nn}) = w^*A'w$, therefore $A'$ is not positive definite. $\endgroup$ – flawr Sep 25 '19 at 18:33
  • $\begingroup$ That makes a lot of sense, thank you very much!! $\endgroup$ – Pablo Jeken Sep 25 '19 at 19:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.