I'm a bit embarrassed to ask this, but I've gotten myself confused over what I think is a simple issue. Let $A$ be a local ring, $k$ its residue field, and $M,N$ finitely generated $A$-modules. An exercise in Atiyah and Macdonald asserts that if $M \otimes_A N = 0$, then either $M = 0$ or $N = 0$. They give a hint in which they use the notation $M_k = M \otimes_A k$: it says $M \otimes_A N = 0$ implies $(M \otimes_A N)_k = 0$ implies $M_k \otimes_k N_k = 0$. I don't fully understand what happened in the second step.

This motivates the following more general question: if $A$ is any commutative ring and $B$ a commutative $A$-algebra, and $M,N$ are $B$-modules, can we identify $M \otimes_A N \cong M \otimes_B N$ as, say, $A$-modules? I think this is either very obvious or very naive.

  • $\begingroup$ $M\otimes_A N$ is an $A$ module, so $(M\otimes_A N)_k$ is a $k$-module (a vector space). But if $M\otimes_A N$ is the zero module, then tensoring with $k$ is still the $0$ module, so $(M\otimes_A N)_k = 0$. $\endgroup$ – Arturo Magidin Apr 18 '11 at 19:30
  • $\begingroup$ Right, but what happened in the second step? As elgeorges pointed out, the more general question is false, so why does $(M \otimes_A N)_k = 0$ imply $M_k \otimes_k N_k = 0$? The first module can be identified with $M_k \otimes_A N_k$... $\endgroup$ – Justin Campbell Apr 18 '11 at 20:27

No, we may not in general make the identification evoked in your more general question.
For example take $A=\mathbb R , B=\mathbb C , M=N =\mathbb C$. Then $\mathbb C \otimes_{\mathbb C} \mathbb C =\mathbb C$ whereas $\mathbb C \otimes_{\mathbb R} \mathbb C=\mathbb C \times \mathbb C $.

But sometimes we may...

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I should have thought about it for longer... but does this work when $A$ is local and $B$ is its residue field? This is not a localization map, so the answer linked to does not apply. $\endgroup$ – Justin Campbell Apr 18 '11 at 20:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Given a completely arbitrary $A$-algebra $B$ and arbitrary $A$-modules $M$ and $N$, the $B$-modules $ (M \otimes_A N)\otimes_A B$ and $(M \otimes_A B)\otimes_B (N \otimes_A B)$ are $B$-linearly isomorphic. This justifies the second step you mentioned in your question (where $B$ is the residue field $k$ ) . A reference is Bourbaki, Algebra, Chapter II, §5.1, Proposition 3. Strangely this result doesn't seem to be mentioned in the more popular references I have just checked so don't be too harsh on yourself for not having known this :) $\endgroup$ – Georges Elencwajg Apr 18 '11 at 22:34

For the second step, you actually have equality: $(M \otimes _A N)_k = (M \otimes _A N) \otimes _A (k \otimes _A k) = M_k \otimes _A N_k = M_k \otimes _k N_k$, hence the conclusion.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.