According to Wikipedia:
Formally, a function $f$ is real analytic on an open set $D$ in the real line if for any $x_0\in D$ one can write
$$f(x)=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }a_{n}\left(x-x_{0}\right)^{n}=a_{0}+a_{1}(x-x_{0})+a_{2}(x-x_{0})^{2}+a_{3}(x-x_{0})^{3}+\cdots$$
in which the coefficients $a_{0},a_{1},\dots$ are real numbers and the series is convergent to $f(x)$ for $x$ in a neighborhood of $x_0$.
This seems stronger than the requirement that $f(x)$ simply has a Taylor series about some point $a$, convergent everywhere in some neighborhood of $a$.
Does this mean that there is, e.g. a real function, $q(x)$, with a valid Taylor series expansion about $a$ but no valid convergent Taylor series of $q(x)$ about any other point arbitrarily close to $a$ (i.e. a real function with a Taylor series about $a$ that fails to be real analytic on any open set containing $a$) or does the fact that a function has a Taylor series about $a$ that converges over some neighborhood of $a$ to the function necessarily imply that it is real analytic on some neighborhood of $a$?