4
$\begingroup$

I have become a TA for a professor who teaches differential equations. The course is basically a self study course where students are to use their previous knowledge to explore and teach themselves differential equations. There is no book for the class which makes this hard for some students. I am reaching out to the community to see if there are any differential equation textbooks out there that really help a student self study differential equations. In doing some research I have found "A First Course in Differential Equations with Modeling Applications by Dennis G. Zill" as well as "Fundamentals of Differential Equations by R. Kent Nagle" to be somewhat decent. Thank you for your recommendations.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The title can be up to 150 characters. Can you perhaps find a better title for your question? $\endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Sep 15, 2019 at 13:59

3 Answers 3

4
$\begingroup$

I think Hirsch and Smale's First edition book is absolutely amazing. It progresses nicely starting with linear systems, and generalizing the treatment to non-linear ODEs. It treats the linear algebra clearly, it's very geometric, and the theorems are stated clearly, and proven very nicely. In this book they're not really concerned with the billions of techniques of solving ODEs, rather they are focused on a few key principles, and they elucidate them very nicely. (as you can tell, I'm very fond of this book)

A second book which treats the material in a similar spirit is Lawrence Perko's Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. I found Perko's and Hirsch/Smale to be very nice complementary texts.

Finally, if you want a fearlessly general glimpse to the subject of ODEs, Henri Cartan's book Differential Calculus has a small chapter devoted to the main setup of the theory; existence, uniqueness, smooth dependence on initial conditions, linear equations etc in the general context of Banach spaces.


But really, the subject of ODEs is very big, and different books have different goals. The books I mentioned focus on the geometric aspect and linear algebra (for the first two), but if you/the prof have different intentions, then obviously, you should consider a different source.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have the link for the Hirsch and Smale's First edition text book? $\endgroup$ Sep 15, 2019 at 16:46
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidWisniewski Unfortunately, I don't have a link. I think the first edition isn't being published anymore, so you'll have to search pretty hard on Amazon/other websites. It's probably going to be very expensive as well to get a new one (if you can even find it). Your best bet is probably to find a copy in a Math library. But if you really can't find it, then you should get Perko's book, because it is very similar, and for a few sub-sections, I found it to be clearer (although other times, he refers to readers to Hirsch/Smale for proofs) $\endgroup$
    – peek-a-boo
    Sep 15, 2019 at 19:33
  • $\begingroup$ Hirsch and Smale's is introductory? does it cover what I need for an Introductory Course? $\endgroup$
    – maenju
    Mar 3, 2022 at 19:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @maenju depends what you're covering in the course $\endgroup$
    – peek-a-boo
    Mar 3, 2022 at 19:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @maenju it helps with solving linear ODEs and emphasizes alot that the non-linear theory is determined in large part by the linear theory. In that regard, it's an excellent text (it also talks about flows of vector fields which are important when you go to manifolds). If you're asking about whether this book helps to solve rote problems like "find general solution to $y''+y^2=\sin t$" or some other stuff like that, then the answer is no; that's not the goal of the book (for this, see Tenenbaum's book) $\endgroup$
    – peek-a-boo
    Mar 3, 2022 at 19:06
1
$\begingroup$

Not strictly a book, but Paul Dawkins at Lamar University has a great set of online course notes on differential equations. They go through the material of a full book and give a number of worked examples.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

We used Guterman and Nitecki when I started at Berkeley. Though admittedly separation of variables and integration factor are about all I remember, you might check it out. Trying to study Riemannian Geometry as a PhD student, a "nodding acquaintance" with differential equations was often assumed. I guess I could argue that I developed that.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .