2
$\begingroup$

Is there a 'nice' proof to show that $\det(E^T) = \det(E)$ where $E$ is an elementary matrix?

Clearly it's true for the elementary matrix representing a row being multiplied by a constant, because then $E^T = E$ as it is diagonal.

I was thinking for the "row-addition" type, it's clearly true because if $E_1$ is a matrix representing row-addition then it is either an upper/lower triangular matrix and so $\det(E_1)$ is equal to the product of the diagonals. If $E_1$ is an upper/lower triangular matrix, then $E_1^T$ is a lower/upper triangular matrix and so $\det(E_1^T) = \det(E_1)$ as the diagonal entries remain the same when the matrix is transposed.

How about for the "row-switching" matrix where rows $i$ and $j$ have been swapped on the identity matrix? Can we use the linearity of the rows in a matrix somehow?

Thanks for any help!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It is not true that $\det{M} = \mathrm{tr}\,M$ for upper or lower triangular matrices. $\endgroup$ – josh Mar 20 '13 at 1:35
  • $\begingroup$ @josh Sorry, I've been massively stupid and thought the trace was the product of the diagonals NOT the sum. $\endgroup$ – Noble. Mar 20 '13 at 1:37
3
$\begingroup$

You can use the fact that switching two rows or columns of a matrix changes the sign of the determinant. Switching two rows of $E$ makes it diagonal, then switch the corresponding columns and you have $E^T$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.