0
$\begingroup$

Is it possible to find the common area between curve $xy>b^2$ (rectangular hyperbola) and the rectangle $2\leq x\leq A$ and $2\leq y\leq B$ where $A$ and $B$ are much larger than $b^2$?

From what I think, it should be something like area of rectangle subtracted the area of hyperbola with x-axis. But doing this we also remove the area that is not in the rectangle(for some values of $b^2$), so we add that small part again.

However, how to calculate the area between the hyperbola and x-axis. If I integrate the hyperbola from $2\leq x\leq A$ what about the bound on $y$, how to consider both the bounds?

I don't know if it's really the right approach, but it should not be undefined because $x$ and $y$ are bounded. So how do I calculate the area?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by $x*y$? $\endgroup$ – Allawonder Sep 9 '19 at 8:51
  • $\begingroup$ @Allawonder I mean $x$ multiplied by $y$ $\endgroup$ – resound Sep 9 '19 at 9:03
  • $\begingroup$ I see. Shouldn't that be better written as $xy$? Also, the inequality $xy>b^2$ defines a region bounded by a hyperbola, not a hyperbola. $\endgroup$ – Allawonder Sep 9 '19 at 9:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Calling something by a different name doesn't make it clearer -- it obscures the point. $\endgroup$ – Allawonder Sep 9 '19 at 9:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ People react with a knee jerk but long years ago I've spent time on notation. Mathematical notation follows its traditions often by inertia. It's hard to improve things (as your, @Allawonder, reaction proves). $\endgroup$ – Wlod AA Sep 9 '19 at 10:14
0
$\begingroup$

Let's assume that $\ b>0\ $ (why not?! :-)

Then, the only non-trivial case is $\ b>2;\ $ thus let's assume this $\ b>2.$

Now let's solve the problem, i.e. let's do the computation.

Let $$\ \alpha:=\frac Ab\qquad \beta:=\frac Bb \qquad d:=\frac 2b $$

The common area between curve $x*y>1$ (rectangular hyperbola) and the rectangle $\ d\leq x\leq \alpha\ $ and $d\leq y\leq \beta\ $ is

$$ (\alpha-d)\cdot(\beta-d) - \int_d^\frac 1d \frac 1x\cdot dx\quad =\\ \ \\ \ (\alpha-d)\cdot(\beta-d)\ +\ 2\cdot \log(d) $$

(of course $\ \log(d)<0\ $ since $\ 0<d<1$).

Now, the original area is the above times $\ b^2,$ i.e.

$$ (A-2)\cdot(B-2)\ +\ 2\cdot(\log(2)-\log(b)) $$

I think that that's it.

---------

PS. You may consider $\ 2\ $ as an arbitrary positive real parameter, just imagine that it is arbitrary $\ z>0.\ $ The result will hold under this general notation. (If you squeeze your eyes then you'll see "$z$" in place of $2$ :-).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ By interesting, I mean it's interesting that you solved it in a manner I didn't approach it, and I thanked you because rather than posting a hint or a half thought answer, you tried to make it a complete answer. I am sorry, I never meant to disrespect you. $\endgroup$ – resound Sep 9 '19 at 9:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @resound "I never meant to disrespect you.". Well, you've succeeded. Even now, you've written that I "tried". I didn't try. I simply have provided an answer. You may simply acknowledge the correctness of my solution or you may invalidate it if I were wrong. (And one may also ask straightforward questions, of course). That's all. $\endgroup$ – Wlod AA Sep 9 '19 at 9:30
  • $\begingroup$ @resound, you have asked about the area (remember?) and not about the integer points. These questions are related though, and this relationship forms a classical research topic. $\endgroup$ – Wlod AA Sep 9 '19 at 9:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.