2
$\begingroup$

This is probably a naive question. What is an example of a non-free finitely generated module $M$ over some Laurent polynomial ring $$ L_n=K[X_1,X_1^{-1},\ldots,X_n,X_n^{-1}] $$ where $K$ is a field. It would be nice to have an example with $n=1$.

By a hard theorem of Swan every finitely generated projective module over $L_n$ is free and therefore it suffices to find a non-projective module.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Since $L_n$ is a commutative domain, you can use any quotient of $L_n$ by a nontrivial ideal, say $I$.

$L_n/I$ can't be projective since that would imply that this short exact sequence splits: $$ 0\to I\to L_n\to L_n/I\to 0 $$

But nontrivial ideals of domains cannot be summands.


For any ring $R$ with a maximal right ideal $M$, $R/M$ is going to be free iff $R/M=R$ is a simple right $R$ module, in which case it is a division ring. Thus $R/M$ is never free for any non-division ring $R$. (And of course, it is cyclic.)

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Even without knowing that it is enough to find a non-projective, it is still easy to see that such a quotient cannot be free, as it has torsion. $\endgroup$ – Tobias Kildetoft Mar 19 '13 at 13:15
1
$\begingroup$

Concerning the question there is nothing special about the ring of Laurent polynomials.

For a commutative ring $R \neq 0$, the following are equivalent:

  • $R$ is a field.
  • Every $R$-module is free.
  • Every finitely generated $R$-module is free.
  • For every ideal $I \subseteq R$ the $R$-module $R/I$ is free.
  • $R$ has exactly two ideals.
  • $R$ has exactly two principal ideals.

If these statements are $1,\dotsc,6$, then $1 \Rightarrow 2$ follows from Zorn's Lemma, $2 \Rightarrow 3 \Rightarrow 4$ are trivial, $4 \Rightarrow 5$ follows from the observation that free modules have annihilator $0$ (in case of rank $>0$) or $R$ (rank $=0$), and $5 \Rightarrow 6 \Rightarrow 1$ are trivial.

Of course $k[X,X^{-1}]$ is not a field, see here for various reasons. Unwinding the proofs, one finds for example that the $k[X,X^{-1}]$-module $k[X,X^{-1}]/(X-1) \cong k$ is not free.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @ron It's pretty easy to do the same thing (with the first three - I didn't bother to check the last three) in noncommutative rings. $R$ is a division ring iff all right $R$ modules are free iff $R/M$ is free for a maximal right ideal $M$. If $R/M$ is free, it is just $R$ by simplicity of $R/M$, thus $R$ is a simple $R$ module, aka a division ring. So you can see here that simple modules make great candidates for nonfree modules. $\endgroup$ – rschwieb Mar 19 '13 at 17:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.