0
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal{B}(F)$ the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a complex Hilbert space $(F, \langle \cdot, \cdot\rangle)$.

Let $A\in\mathcal{B}(F)$. Assume that there is unit vector $x\in F$ such that $\langle Ax, x\rangle:=\mu \in \mathbb{C}$. Why there are unit vector $y\in F$ and $\nu\geq 0$ such that $$Ax=\mu x+\nu y\;?$$

My attempt: Since $x$ is a unit vector, then $x\neq 0$. So, $$F=\text{span}(x)\oplus \text{span}(x)^\perp.$$ So, since $Tx\in F$ then $Ax=\alpha x+x_2$ with $x_2\in \text{span}(x)^\perp$. Clearly $\alpha =\mu$. Why $$x_2=\nu y \;?$$ with $\|y\|=1$ and $\nu\geq 0$.

I think one can write $x_2$ as $x_2=\frac{x_2}{\|x_2\|}\times \|x_2\|$ but perhaps $x_2$ is equal to $0$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

If $Ax = \mu x$, you can choose any $y$ and $\nu=0$. Otherwise, choose $$ y = \frac{Ax-\mu x}{\|Ax-\mu x\|}\quad\text{and}\quad\nu = \|Ax-\mu x\|. $$ The information that $\langle Ax,x\rangle = \mu$ is superfluous.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Why it is superfluous? please see my edit. Thanks. $\endgroup$ – Schüler Sep 7 '19 at 13:36
  • $\begingroup$ It is superfluous because I did not use that information in my proof. $\endgroup$ – amsmath Sep 7 '19 at 14:52
  • $\begingroup$ but $\mu$ is correct. $\endgroup$ – Schüler Sep 7 '19 at 15:02
  • $\begingroup$ @Schüler What? What do you mean by "correct"? How can a number ($\mu$) be "correct"? $\endgroup$ – amsmath Sep 7 '19 at 15:06
  • $\begingroup$ I mean the expression of $\mu$ is correct. $\endgroup$ – Schüler Sep 7 '19 at 15:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.