1
$\begingroup$

I have been reading Kato's perturbation theory book and on spectral theory in general, and I have a question regarding the separation of spectrum (c.f. Kato, Perturbation theory for linear operators, Theorem III.6.18). I'll explain the general setup below.

$X$ is a complex Banach space and $\mathcal{L}:X\to X$ is a bounded operator. For $z\in\sigma(\mathcal{L})$ which is isolated, he defines the spectral projection as $\pi_z=\frac{1}{2i\pi}\int_C (wI-\mathcal{L})^{-1}dw\in B(X)$, where $C$ is a small circle around $z$, and $B(X)$ is the space of bounded operators on $X$.

When $\mathcal{L}$ is finite rank, he mentions that $\pi_z$ is the projection onto the generalized eigenspace associated to $z$.

Does this naturally extend to operators which are not finite rank; for example if $z$ is an isolated eigenvalue such that $\pi_z$ has finite dimensional range, then can we say $\pi_z$ projects onto the generalised eigenspace of $z$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, exactly. You can find that in the book of Dunford and Schwarz ("Linear Operators, Part I"). The assumption on the finite-dimensional range of the projection is crucial here and cannot be dropped. $\endgroup$ – amsmath Aug 30 '19 at 20:45
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the reference! :) $\endgroup$ – Artur Aug 30 '19 at 20:53
  • $\begingroup$ You're welcome. $\endgroup$ – amsmath Aug 30 '19 at 21:06
0
$\begingroup$

If $z$ is an isolated point of the spectrum, then $\pi_z$ is well-defined by the integral around $z$ that encloses no other points of the spectrum. And, $$ (\mathcal{L}-zI)\pi_z = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_{C}(\mathcal{L}-zI)(wI-\mathcal{L})^{-1}dw \\ = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_{C}(w-z)(wI-\mathcal{L})^{-1}dw $$ The same is true for all positive powers of $\mathcal{L}-zI$, i.e., $(\mathcal{L}-zI)^n$ is turned into $(w-z)^{n}$ inside the integral for $n=1,2,3,\cdots$: $$ (\mathcal{L}-zI)^n\pi_z =\frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_{C}(w-z)^{n}(wI-\mathcal{L})^{-1}dw. $$ These give the negative coefficients in the Laurent series expansion of the resolvent around $z$. And $(\mathcal{L}-zI)$ implements a ladder from one coefficient to the next. $(\mathcal{L}-zI)^n\pi_z$ is eventually found to be $0$ by making assumptions about rank.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.