In Apostol, little-o $f(x) = o(g(x))$ is defined as $\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$. However, in Wiki it is defined as $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$. How do we determine the limit point from the notation? Is it possible that $f(x) = o(g(x))$ if $x \rightarrow 0$, while $f(x) \neq o(g(x))$, if $x \rightarrow \infty$


We usually point out the limit of $x$ in the text, such as "$f=o(g)$ as $x\to0$" for the first case and "$f=o(g)$ as $x\to\infty$" for the second case.

Yes. For example, $f(x)=x$ and $g(x)=1$.


I'm gonna cite another way to define it without limit of $\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$, maybe this will result easier:

Let be $f : U \longmapsto \mathbb{R},x_{0}$ accumulation point of $f$. We say that $$f = o(g(x)) \hspace{0.2cm} x \to x_{0}$$

If exists $\epsilon : U \longmapsto \mathbb{R} :$

$$f(x) = \epsilon(x) \cdot g(x), \hspace{0.3cm} \lim\limits_{x \to x_{0}} \epsilon(x) = 0$$

  • $\begingroup$ What is $\epsilon(x)$ but another way to say $\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$? $\endgroup$ Aug 27 '19 at 16:16
  • $\begingroup$ @MishaLavrov It doesn't require to define a quotient. $\endgroup$ Aug 27 '19 at 16:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ While in my opinion, this is a better way of defining little-o, all the explanation is about things the OP did not ask, while the only thing that in any way addresses the OP's question is tacked on without discussion. Namely, including $x \to x_0$ in the notation. $\endgroup$ Aug 27 '19 at 17:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.