3
$\begingroup$

In regards to this question, I feel I can produce a complicated counterexample as follows. I wonder if I have made a mistake in this argument.

  1. We know that $m+n\sqrt{2}$ is dense in $\mathbb{R}$ as $m,n$ vary over the integers. Therefore, let $s_n=(a_n+b_n\sqrt{2})$ be a sequence of numbers which converges to $1$.

  2. Then the function $f_n(x)=\exp(is_nx)$ converges pointwise to the function $f(x)=\exp(ix)$.

  3. Now, there is a subsequence of $f_n$ which converges weakly in the topology of $B^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$. Let us call this limit as $g$. This is due to the fact that $B^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$ is a Hilbert space, therefore, it is reflexive. As a result, any bounded sequence has a weakly convergent subsequence. The non-separability of $B^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$ is not an issue since we can always choose to work with the closed subspace of $B^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$ generated by the terms of the sequence. A proof is given here.

  4. Then there is a further subsequence of $f_n$ whose Cesaro means converge to $g$ strongly in the norm of $B^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$. This too is a general property of Hilbert spaces, given a weakly convergent sequence, one can find a subsequence whose Cesaro means converge in the norm. A proof is given here.

  5. The sequence of Cesaro means converges in $B^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$ therefore it also converges in $L^2_\text{loc}(\mathbb{R}^d)$.

  6. Any sequence that converges in $L^2_\text{loc}(\mathbb{R}^d)$ has a subsequence which converges pointwise almost everywhere.

  7. However, the original sequence $f_n$ converges pointwise to $f$, therefore $f=g$.

  8. The above line of argument shows that the entire sequence $f_n$ converges weakly to $f$ in $B^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$. The argument is the following: We started with the sequence $f_n$ and showed that every weakly convergent subsequence has a further subsequence that weakly converges to $f$. Here is a proof.

  9. But, the norms of $f_n$, $||f_n||_{B^2}=1$ converges to the norm of $f$, $||f||_{B^2}=1$. As a consequence, the sequence $f_n$ converges strongly to $f$ in the norm of $B^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$. See here.

But this is clearly impossible because the sequence $f_n$ has no convergent subsequences on account of the distance between each of them being positive.

I feel that my argument is correct but I am not able to find the flaw. I would be thankful for any help.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @mathworker21 Yes, the distance between any distinct two of them is $\sqrt{2}$ due to orthogonality. $\endgroup$ – Tanuj Dipshikha Sep 8 '19 at 18:08
  • $\begingroup$ @mathworker21 I have added more information for points 3, 4, 8. $\endgroup$ – Tanuj Dipshikha Sep 9 '19 at 6:07
  • $\begingroup$ Also, isn't there a quotienting issue, cause the seminorm is a seminorm, not a norm. $\endgroup$ – mathworker21 Sep 9 '19 at 7:10
  • $\begingroup$ @mathworker21 Yes, there is a quotienting issue, but I have not thought about it much, because I felt that it might be ok to work with a representative element. I will think about it. $\endgroup$ – Tanuj Dipshikha Sep 9 '19 at 7:13
  • $\begingroup$ See my answer below. If you object to the proposed definition of the title of your question, I'll delete my answer. $\endgroup$ – mathworker21 Sep 9 '19 at 7:38
2
+150
$\begingroup$

I think the quotienting is the issue. You first have to clarify what you mean by "convergence in $B^2$ implies convergence in $L^2_{loc}$". Does that mean "if $[f_n] \to [f]$ in $B^2$, then there are $\phi_n,\phi \in L^2_{loc}$ with $||\phi_n||_{B^2} = ||\phi||_{B^2} = 0$ and $f_n+\phi_n \to f+\phi$ in $L^2_{loc}$", where $[f]$ denotes the equivalence class of $f$ in the quotiented $B^2$? If so, then when you go from Cesaro convergence to $g$ in $B^2$ to Cesaro convergence to $g$ in $L^2_{loc}$, you are no longer looking at the Cesaro average of $f_{n_j}$, but rather of $f_{n_j}+\phi_{n_j}$ for some $(\phi_{n_j})_j$ and thus can no longer claim that $g+\phi$ is equal to $f$, since we don't know what the a.e. pointwise Cesaro average of $f_{n_j}+\phi_{n_j}$ is.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.