2
$\begingroup$

Given a parabola's parametric equation I want to find its axis of symmetry.

The parametric equation is $$\begin{cases} x=a_1t^2+b_1t+c_1 \\ y=a_2t^2+b_2t+c_2 \end{cases}, t\in\mathbb{R}.$$

This is parabola as was shown in other question.

I understand that one can start with finding the general equation from this parametric one, proceed with finding the rotation angle, getting rid of $xy$ term and finally finding an axis of symmetry.

My question is whether there is a simpler way to do this? The resulting line may also be given by a parametric equation.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do you get the vertex when t=0? If so, the tangent at t=0 would be normal to the axis of symmetry maybe? (These aren't hints, I'm just talking out of the top of my head.) $\endgroup$ – Matthew Daly Aug 14 at 7:31
  • $\begingroup$ @Matthew Daly, yes, the point $t=0$ is included but it's not guaranteed that it would be parabola's vertex. Is that what you were trying to say? $\endgroup$ – Atin Aug 14 at 7:51
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that is what I was trying to ask. Drat. $\endgroup$ – Matthew Daly Aug 14 at 7:52
3
$\begingroup$

As I mentioned in this answer, a parabola’s axis is parallel to the diagonal of the parallelogram defined by the tangents at two points. It’s not hard to work out that the tangents at $t=\pm1$ intersect at the point $(c_1-a_1,c_2-a_2)$, so the parabola’s axis is parallel to $$(a_1+b_1+c_1,a_2+b_2+c_2)+(a_1-b_1+c_1,a_2-b_2+c_2)-2(c_1-a_1,c_2-a_2) = (4a_1,4a_2),$$ or simply $(a_1,a_2)$.

The vertex is the point at which the tangent is orthogonal to this vector: $$(a_1,a_2)\cdot(2a_1t+b_1,2a_2t+b_2) = 0,$$ from which $t=-{a_1b_1+a_2b_2\over 2(a_1^2+a_2^2)}$. I’ll leave working out the equation of the axis from these two bits of information to you.


P.S.: If you do happen to have the equation in general Cartesian form, finding the axis direction is also quite easy: it’s an eigenvector of $0$ of the matrix that corresponds to the quadratic part of the equation. If you work through the calculations, you’ll find that this eigenspace is spanned by $(a_1,a_2)$. The vertex is the point at which the normal is parallel to this vector, which can be expressed as the vanishing of a determinant, giving you a system of two equations to solve for the vertex coordinates.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "From a distance", a parabola looks like a double-ray along its axis, and its axis looks like a line through the origin, so you can determine the direction vector of that axis by noticing $(x,y)\propto (a_1,a_2)$ as $t\to\pm\infty$. (That argument is perhaps a bit loosey-goosey. Luckily, the parallelogram approach confirms it. :) $\endgroup$ – Blue Aug 14 at 12:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Blue I’m sure that can be formalized somehow. I more often come at it from a projective point of view (the axis direction is the tangent point to the line at infinity) but that’s easier to do with a Cartesian equation. $\endgroup$ – amd Aug 14 at 19:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.