4
$\begingroup$

Here is a Lemma from this paper, which maybe helpful for the answering my question. enter image description here

A topological space $X$ is said to be star compact if whenever $\mathscr{U}$ is an open cover of $X$, there is a compact subspace $K$ of $X$ such that $X = \operatorname{St}(K,\mathscr{U})$.

Let $\mathscr{U}$ be an open cover of $X$ and $\mathscr{V}\;$ be a finite subset of $\mathscr{U}$ covering $K$; if $\operatorname{St}(\cup\mathscr{V},\mathscr{U})=X$. Then we called $X$ is $1$-starcompact. Clearly, every star compact space implies $1$-starcompact.

My question is this:

If $X$ is a regular star-compact, first countable, has the cardinality of $\aleph_1$, then is $X$ countably compact?

Thanks ahead:)


One direction: If 1-starcompact in this space is closed hereditarily, I think, the question will be solved.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Could you explain what you mean by $\operatorname{St}(K,\mathcal{U})$? I have never seen this notation before. $\endgroup$ – Jakub Konieczny Mar 16 '13 at 13:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Feanor: $=\bigcup\{U\in \mathcal{U}: U\cap K\not=\emptyset\}$ $\endgroup$ – Paul Mar 16 '13 at 13:09
2
$\begingroup$

$1$-starcompactness is not closed hereditary. This is mentioned immediately after Example $2.3.3$, which shows that the Tikhonov plank is $1$-starcompact: the set $\{\omega_1\}\times\omega$ is a closed, discrete subset of the plank that is clearly not $1$-starcompact.

The result in your question is at least consistently true. This follows from Lemma $2.2.10$ of the paper:

Lemma $\mathbf{2.2.10}$. If $X$ is a regular first countable $1$-starcompact space with $w(X)<\mathfrak d$, then $X$ is countably compact.

Now let $X$ be a regular, first countable, star-compact space of cardinality $\omega_1$. As you point out in the question, $X$ is $1$-starcompact. Moreover, $w(X)\le\chi(X)\cdot|X|=\omega\cdot\omega_1=\omega_1\le\mathfrak d$. If $\omega_1<\mathfrak d=2^\omega$, which is known to be consistent (e.g., it follows from $\mathsf{MA}+\neg\mathsf{CH}$), then $X$ is countably compact by Lemma $2.2.10$.

Thus, if there is a consistent counterexample, it will have to be in a model in which $\mathfrak d=\omega_1$. And indeed Example $\mathbf{2.3.5}$ of the paper turns out to be such a counterexample. The paper contains a proof that this space $X$ is $1$-starcompact, but in fact it is star-compact.

Proof. Let $\mathscr{U}$ be any open cover of $X$. For $k\in\omega$ define $U_k$ and $f\in D$ as in the proof that $X$ is $1$-starcompact. Let $K=L_f\cup\{g\in D:g\le^*f\}$; I claim that $K$ is compact. $K\cap D$ is homeomorphic to $\alpha+1$ for some countable ordinal $\alpha$ and is therefore compact. Suppose that $V$ is an open nbhd of $K\cap D$, and $A=L_f\setminus V$ is infinite. $L_f\cap\big(\{k\}\times\omega\big)$ is finite for each $k\in\omega$, so $A\cap\big(\{k\}\times\omega\big)$ is finite for each $k\in\omega$, and it follows from the proof of Claim $\mathbf 2$ of the paper that $A$ has a limit point $g\in K\cap D$. But then $g\in V$, so $V\cap A\ne\varnothing$, contradicting the choice of $A$. Thus, $A$ is finite, and $K$ is compact.

Let $F=\{k\in\omega:K\cap U_k=\varnothing\}$; then $F$ is finite, and $\operatorname{st}(K,\mathscr{U})\supseteq K\cup\big((\omega\setminus F)\times\omega\big)\cup(\omega\setminus F)$. Then $K\cup F$ is compact, and $S=(\omega\times\omega)\setminus\operatorname{st}(K\cup F,\mathscr{U})$ is finite, so $K\cup F\cup S$ is compact, and $\operatorname{st}(K\cup F\cup S,\mathscr{U})\supseteq K\cup(\omega\times\omega)\cup\omega$. That is, $X\setminus\operatorname{st}(K\cup F\cup S,\mathscr{U})\subseteq D\setminus K$. But $D\setminus K$ is homeomorphic to $\omega_1$ and is therefore star finite (= strongly $1$-starcompact), so there is a finite $E\subseteq D\setminus K$ such that $K\cup F\cup S\cup E$ is compact and $\operatorname{st}(K\cup F\cup S\cup E,\mathscr{U})=X$. $\dashv$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.