Consider the planar system, $$x'=x(\mu-2x)-xy, \ \ \ y'=y(x-1)+y^2 \ \ \ (\mu\in\mathbb{R}).$$

It can be shown that $(x^*,y^*)=\left(\mu-1, \ 2-\mu\right)$ is a fixed point of the above system. But what is the bifurcation phenomena of this fixed point? The stability matrix associated with this fixed point is $$A=\begin{pmatrix} 2-2\mu & 1-\mu \\ 2-\mu & 2-\mu \end{pmatrix}.$$ The eigenvalues of $A$ can be expressed as $$\lambda=\frac{(4-3\mu)\pm\sqrt{5\mu^2-12\mu+8}}{2}.$$ My initial thought was that $\mu=\frac{4}{3}$ was a Hopf bifurcation, as $\Re(\lambda)=0$. But from my understanding, $\lambda$ must be purely imaginary when $\mu=\frac{4}{3}$ for this to be a Hopf bifurcation, and this is not the case.

Perhaps a bifurcation point does not exist?



As the roots for $5\mu^2-12\mu + 8 = 0$ are complex, no existence of Hopf bifurcation.

Follows the plot for the eigenvalues

$$ \frac{1}{2} \left(4-3\mu\pm\sqrt{5 \mu ^2-12 \mu +8}\right) $$

enter image description here

  • $\begingroup$ There seems to be a change in stability. Is there a bifurcation point (not a Hopf) at $\mu=1$ and $\mu=2$? $\endgroup$ – Bell Aug 9 at 9:24
  • $\begingroup$ @Bell As can be depicted, for $\mu \lt 1$ we have sources. For $1\lt \mu\lt 2$ we have saddle points and for $\mu > 2$ we have sinks. This regarding this equilibrium point. $\endgroup$ – Cesareo Aug 9 at 9:34
  • $\begingroup$ I am sorry but I am unsure of some of your terminology (e.g. sinks), but I think I understand. $\mu=1$ is NOT a bifurcation but $\mu=2$ IS a bifurcation? $\endgroup$ – Bell Aug 9 at 9:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Bell Hopf bifurcations occur when a periodic solution appears. Please. See the Hopf bifurcation definition in Wikipedia. Have a look also at staff.www.ltu.se/~larserik/applmath/chap9en/part7.html $\endgroup$ – Cesareo Aug 9 at 9:51
  • $\begingroup$ I agree that there are no HOPF bifurcations, but I believe $\mu=2$ is a bifurcation point (for $1<\mu<2$ we have an unstable hyperbolic saddle point and for $\mu>2$ we have a stable improper node... is this not indicative of a bifurcation at $\mu=2$?). I also appreciate the link, it has helped with the terminology. $\endgroup$ – Bell Aug 9 at 9:55

Hint, you have more equilibrium points, namely $(0,0), (\frac{1}{2}\mu,0), (0,1)$. What happens with $(\mu-1,2-\mu)$ when $\mu=1$ or $\mu=2$?

  • $\begingroup$ We get $(0,1)$ and $(1,0)$. I'm not sure of the significance of this. Can we relate this too the results obtain for the other equilibrium points? That would be neat. $\endgroup$ – Bell Aug 9 at 9:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.