1
$\begingroup$

What is the maximum cardinality of a set $Z \subset \mathbb{N}$ such that for any distinct $a_1, a_2, a_3 \in Z$, their sum $a_1 + a_2 + a_3$ is prime?

This means: $Z = \{a_1, a_2, a_3, \cdots, a_n\}$, $a_i \in N^{*}$, $a_1 < a_2 < \cdots < a_n$, then $a_i + a_j + a_k$ ($i\neq j\neq k$) is prime. Find $|Z|_{max}$.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This makes no sense. If English is a real problem, perhaps you could put in a number of examples to illustrate what you are talking about. $\endgroup$ – Will Jagy Mar 16 '13 at 4:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is not clear to me what the question is asking. Almost everything is the sum of primes. For example $9=2+2+2+3$. Do you mean $2$ primes? Or $2$ distinct primes? By "any of the three" do you mean the sum of any three"? $\endgroup$ – André Nicolas Mar 16 '13 at 4:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is very unclear. If English isn't your native language, then add the original text to this post, and use the (translation-request) tag. Hopefully, someone can help you out. $\endgroup$ – Cameron Buie Mar 16 '13 at 4:35
  • $\begingroup$ I've edited the question to how Zander and I interpreted the question. If this is incorrect, please let us know. $\endgroup$ – TMM Mar 29 '13 at 14:11
2
$\begingroup$

If I have interpreted the question correctly, you want the size of the largest set $Z$ of positive integers such that the sum of any three elements of $Z$ is prime.

$Z$ cannot have 5 elements, otherwise by the pigeonhole principle there would exist $a,b,c\in Z$ satisfying either $$ a\equiv b\equiv c \pmod{3} $$ or $$ a \equiv b+1 \equiv c+2 \pmod{3} $$ In either case $a+b+c=3k, k>1$ is composite.

However $Z=\{1,5,7,11\}$ satisfies the condition so $|Z|_{max}=4$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Please forgive me if I answered the wrong question. $\endgroup$ – Zander Mar 29 '13 at 13:56
  • $\begingroup$ This is also how I understand the question, and your answer seems correct, so (+1) from me! $\endgroup$ – TMM Mar 29 '13 at 14:04
0
$\begingroup$



Added
I am still confused with your question. I hope this theorem is of relative importance to your question.

Theorem: (Vinogradov)

Any sufficiently large odd integer n can be written as a sum of three prime numbers.


By "sufficiently large" we mean $n > 10^{43000}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know what Chen and Wang proved, but the fact that every large enough odd number is the sum of three primes is due to Vinogradov. $\endgroup$ – Chris Eagle Mar 16 '13 at 6:40
  • $\begingroup$ You're right, Chen and Wang just improved on the bound. $\endgroup$ – Rustyn Mar 16 '13 at 6:41
  • $\begingroup$ this mean : $Z=\{a_{1},a_{2},a_{3},\cdots,a_{n}\},a_{i}\in N^{*}$,then $a_{i}+a_{j}+a_{k},(i\neq j\neq l)$ was primes,find $|Z|_{max}$ $\endgroup$ – math110 Mar 16 '13 at 6:45
  • $\begingroup$ yes,Thank you my frend $\endgroup$ – math110 Mar 16 '13 at 6:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.