Intuition Behind Generalized Stokes Theorem Consider the Generalized Stokes Theorem:
\begin{equation}
\int_Md\omega = \int_{\partial{M}} \omega
\end{equation}
Here, $\omega$ is a k-form defined on $R^n$, and $d\omega$ (a k+1 form defined on $R^n$) is the exterior derivative of $\omega$. Let M be a smooth k+1-manifold in $R^n$ and $\partial{M}$ (the boundary of M) be a smooth k manifold.
I know that the above theorem is simply a generalization of well-known vector calculus theorems. However, I am looking for the intuition behind the Generalized Stokes Theorem itself.
I started off by defining the exterior derivative at a point p in $R^n$ as: 
\begin{equation}
d\omega_p =\lim_{|vol|\to 0}\frac{\int_{\partial{vol}} \omega}{|vol|}
\end{equation}
In this case, "$vol$" represents a k+1 "parallelpiped" in $R^n$ that contains point p (with $|vol|$ being its "volume"). $\partial{vol}$ represents the boundary of this k+1 "parallelpiped", a k "parallelpiped" itself.
With this definition (assuming it is correct), can we say that $\omega$ represents an infinitesimal "flux" element through $\partial{vol}$ which would imply that $d\omega_p$ is simply the "flux density" at a point p?
If the above is true, can we take the idea that (when applying the Generalized Stokes Theorem) the interior "fluxes" through each $\partial{vol}$ within M cancel out leaving us with the total "flux" out of $\partial{M}$ as the intuition behind the Generalized Stokes Theorem?
Any help is much appreciated.
 A: Yes, this is very good intuition for the theorem. All of this can be made precise.
In fact, it is made precise on pages 188-190 of the second edition of Arnold's Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. There Arnold gives the following theorem, where $\omega$ is a given $k$-form on an $n$-dimensional manifold $M$.
First, the geometric setup. The idea is to construct a $(k+1)$-form by computing its value on a given list of $k+1$ vectors.
So let $\xi_1,\ldots,\xi_{k+1}$ be tangent vectors in $T_xM$, where $x\in M$. We can pull these back to $\mathbb{R}^n$ in the following way. Choose a coordinate system $\phi:U\to\mathbb{R}^n$ for $x\in U$ with $\phi(x)=0$. The preimages of the $\xi_i$ under the differential of $\phi^{-1}$ are tangent vectors $\xi_i^*$ in $T_0\mathbb{R}^n$. But we can naturally identify this tangent space with $\mathbb{R}^n$ itself. Let $\Pi^{*}$ be the parallelepiped in $\mathbb{R}^n$ spanned by these vectors. The map $\phi^{-1}$ carries this linear parallelepiped onto a "curvilinear parallelepiped" $\Pi$ in $M$ (this is like what you call "vol"), the boundary of which is a $k$-chain, $\partial\Pi$ (which is like what you call the boundary of "vol"). Define $F$ to be the integral of the given $k$-form $\omega$ on the boundary of this curvilinear parallelepiped:
$$F(\xi_1,\ldots,\xi_{k+1})=\int_{\partial\Pi}\omega$$
Theorem. There is a unique $(k+1)$-form $\Omega$ on $T_xM$ which is the principal $(k+1)$-linear part at zero of $F$, i.e.
$$F(\epsilon\xi_1,\ldots,\epsilon\xi_{k+1})=\epsilon^{k+1}\Omega(\xi_1,\ldots,\xi_{k+1})+o(e^{k+1})$$
as $\epsilon\to0$. The form $\Omega$ does not depend on the choice of coordinates. And this unique form $\Omega$ is precisely $d\omega$ (in the usual calculation).
In this sense, $d\omega$ is indeed a kind of "flux density" of $\omega$.
The proof of the generalized Stokes theorem then follows, as littleO suggests in a comment, by making precise the idea of chopping up the manifold into little parallelepipeds. One just keeps track of all the orientations as one integrates the flux density over these little regions, $\int_{M}d\omega$. When you do so carefully, the interior fluxes cancel, leaving only the flux along the boundary, $\int_{\partial M}\omega$.
