1
$\begingroup$

I wish to prove the following: For every scheme $X$ there exists a unique morphism of schemes $X\rightarrow Spec(\mathbb{Z})$.

Here is what I have so far: if $X$ is affine, say $X\simeq Spec(A)$ for a ring $A$, I know that morphisms of schemes $Spec(A)\rightarrow Spec(B)$ are in one to one correspondence with ring homomorphisms $B\rightarrow A$. Any homomorphism $\phi:\mathbb{Z}\rightarrow A$ must satisfy $\phi(1) = 1$ and is thus unique.

If $X$ is a scheme, we have an open cover $(X_i)_{i\in I}$ such that $(X_i,\mathcal{O}_{X}\mid X_i ) \simeq (Spec(A_i),\mathcal{O}_{Spec(A_i)})$ and hence, there are unique morphisms $f_i:(X_i,\mathcal{O}_{X}\mid X_i )\rightarrow (Spec(\mathbb{Z}),\mathcal{O}_{Spec(\mathbb{Z})})$.

Now I would like to construct a global morphism $f$ by glueing together the local parts $f_i$ but I am not sure how (or even if) this works.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Yes this works because the morphisms are unique. More precisely, on $X_i\cap X_j$, one can find an open cover by affines $(U_k)$. Now the restriction of $f_i$ and $f_j$ to $U_k$ must agree by unicity. It follows that $f_i=f_j$ on $X_i\cap X_j$ since they agree an open cover. This implies that the $f_i$ can be glued together to give a morphism $X\to\operatorname{Spec}\mathbb{Z}$. The unicity is easy. $\endgroup$ – Roland Jul 29 '19 at 19:44
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I get the idea. What worries me a little is that I can see that $f_i\mid_{U_k}=f_j\mid_{U_k}$ implies $f_i = f_j$ as continous maps, but what about the morphisms of sheaves $f_i^{\sharp}:\mathcal{O}_{Spec(\mathbb{Z})}\rightarrow (f_i)_*\mathcal{O}_X\mid_{X_i}$? My guess here is that it follows from the fact that the Hom - sheaf $\underline{Hom}(\mathcal{F},\mathcal{G})$ is a sheaf if $\mathcal{G}$ is one. Or am I thinking too complicated here? $\endgroup$ – Teddyboer Jul 29 '19 at 20:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Two morphisms of sheaves which agree on an open cover are equal, this is straightforward. Of course it follows from the fact that the Hom sheaf is a sheaf, but I don't usually mention this proposition when glueing or checking equality locally morphisms of schemes. $\endgroup$ – Roland Jul 30 '19 at 12:12
2
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a scheme an let $R$ be a ring. Let me maybe suggest you to try to prove the following:

There is a natural bijection $\text{Hom}_{\text{Sch}}(X, \text{Spec}(R)) \cong \text{Hom}_{\text{Ring}}(R, \Gamma(X,\mathcal{O}_X)).$

This is not only a very useful statement, but also implies what you want to prove as you can use that $\mathbb{Z}$ is a initial object in the category of rings like you were doing for the affine case.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.