3
$\begingroup$

Given two functions: $$ \begin{align} f(x) &= 1 - |x-1|\\ g(x) &= \begin{cases} x,\ \text {if $x\in \Bbb Q$}\\ 2-x,\ \text {if $x\in \Bbb R\setminus\Bbb Q$} \end{cases} \end{align} $$ Study continuity of the following compositions: $$ \begin{align*} (f\circ g)(x)\tag 1\\ (g\circ f)(x)\tag 2 \end{align*} $$


$\Box$ I've started with case $(1)$. Both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ are well defined in $\Bbb R$. So we might consider their composition: $$ (f\circ g)(x) = \begin{cases} 1-|x-1|,\ \text{if $x\in\Bbb Q$}\\ 1-|2-x-1|,\ \text{if $x\in\Bbb R\setminus\Bbb Q$} \end{cases} $$ Or simply: $$ (f\circ g)(x) = 1-|x-1|,\ \forall x\in \Bbb R $$

By composition of continuous functions $1-|x-1|$ is continuous.

Conclusion: $(f\circ g)(x)$ is continuous in $\Bbb R$ $\blacksquare$.


$\Box$ Consider case $(2)$. Again both function are well defined in $\Bbb R$, so we migh consider their composition: $$ (g\circ f)(x) = \begin{cases} 1-|x-1|,\ \text{if $x\in\Bbb Q$}\\ 2 - (1-|x-1|),\ \text{if $x\in\Bbb R\setminus\Bbb Q$} \end{cases} $$

Or simplifying: $$ (g\circ f)(x) = \begin{cases} 1 - |x-1|,\ \text{if $x\in\Bbb Q$}\\ 1 + |x-1|),\ \text{if $x\in\Bbb R\setminus\Bbb Q$} \end{cases} $$

1) It feels natural to consider a point $x_0 = 1$ since it will render the absolute value to $0$, by which: $$ (g\circ f)(x_0) = 1 $$

Take any sequence $(x_n)_{n\in\Bbb N}$ of rational or irrational numbers such that: $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n = 1 $$

For a sequence of rationals: $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}(g\circ f)(x_n) = \lim_{n\to\infty}(1-|x_n - 1|) = 1 = (g\circ f)(1) $$

The same is true for any sequence of irrational numbers.


2) Now consider some point $x_0 \ne 1$. Suppose $x_0$ is irrational. Take any sequence $(x_n)_{n\in\Bbb N}$ such that $\forall n\in\Bbb N: x_n \in \Bbb Q$ and: $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n = x_0 $$

For any sequence $(x_n)_{n\in\Bbb N}$ and $\forall n\in\Bbb N: x_n \in\Bbb Q$: $$ \begin{align} \lim_{n\to\infty}(g\circ f)(x_n) &= \lim_{n\to\infty}(1 - |x_n - 1|) \\ &= 1 - |x_0 - 1| < 1 \end{align} $$

But since $x_0$ is irrational: $$ (g\circ f)(x_0) = 1 + |x_0 - 1| > 1 $$

Which means: $$ \lim_{n\to\infty} (g\circ f)(x_n) \ne (g\circ f)(x_0) $$


3) Suppose $x_0$ is rational and $x_0 \ne 1$, take any sequence $(x_n)_{n\in\Bbb N}$ and $\forall n\in \Bbb N: x_n \in\Bbb R\setminus \Bbb Q$: $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n = x_0 $$ Since $x_0$ is rational we have: $$ (g\circ f)(x_0) = 1 - |x_0 - 1| < 1 $$ But: $$ \begin{align} \lim_{n\to\infty}(g\circ f)(x_n) &= \lim_{n\to\infty}(1 + |x_n - 1|) \\ &= 1 + |x_0 - 1| > 1 \end{align} $$ So: $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}(g\circ f)(x_n) \ne (g\circ f)(x_0) $$ And that completes the proof.

Conclusion: $(g\circ f)(x)$ in continuous at $x = 1$ and $(g\circ f)(x)$ is discontinuous $\forall x \in \Bbb R\setminus \{1\}$ $\blacksquare$.


I'm still a bit lost while studying such bizarre functions and not fully sure in the correctness of my reasoning behind the proof. I would like to ask for verification of the above.

Thank you!

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ For case 2 and 3, your reasoning seems to be a little bit wrong. If $x_n>y_n$ then we only have that $\lim x_n \geqslant \lim y_n$. $\endgroup$ – Botond Jul 18 '19 at 17:17
  • $\begingroup$ @Roman: To fix case $(2)$, use the setup of case $(3)$. You want the sequence $(x_n)$ to approach $x_0$. Also, for both case $(2)$ and case $(3)$, you want $x_0\ne 1$, but you only specified that for case $(2)$. Other than that, your proof looks good (+1). $\endgroup$ – quasi Jul 18 '19 at 17:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @roman:$\;$Also, for a more complete conclusion, I suggest:$\;(g\circ f)(x)$ is continuous at $x=1$ and discontinuous at $x=x_0$ for all $x_0\in\Bbb R{\,\setminus\,}\{1\}$. $\endgroup$ – quasi Jul 18 '19 at 17:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Or simply: $$(f\circ g)(x) = \begin{cases} 1-|x-1|,\ \text{if $x\in\Bbb Q$}\\ 1-|1-x|,\ \text{if $x\in\Bbb R\setminus\Bbb Q$} \end{cases}$$" Even *more* simply $f\circ g(x) = 1-|1-x|$ (whether $x$ is rational or not.) $\endgroup$ – fleablood Jul 18 '19 at 18:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "So it follows that for every real number no matter whether it's rational or irrational the value of the function is the same." Well....no. $f(5) \ne f(6)$ and $f(5)\ne f(\sqrt 3)$ and $f(\sqrt 3) \ne f(\pi)$. so the value of the function is very different. You meant say the expression of the function is $f\circ g(x) = 1-|x-1|=1-|1-x|$ is the same for irrationals and rationals and doesnt need a conditional to express it. $\endgroup$ – fleablood Jul 18 '19 at 18:28
1
$\begingroup$

A quicker simpler way to note that $h(x) = g(x)$ (where $g$ is continuous everywher) if $x$ is rational but $h(x) = f(x) $(where $f$ is continuous everywhere) if $x$ is irrational, is continuous at $x = a$ if and only if $f(a) = g(a)$ is to consider the following.

As $f,g$ are continuous for any $\epsilon > 0$ there are $\delta_1$ and $\delta_2$ so that $|x-a|< \delta_1$ then $|f(x) -f(a)| < \epsilon$ and if $|x-a|< \delta_2$ then $|g(x) -g(a)|< \epsilon$.

If $f(a) = g(a)$ then then if $|x - a| < \min(\delta_1, \delta_2)$ then if $x$ is rational then $|h(x) - h(a)| = |f(x) -f(a)| < \epsilon$. If $x$ is irrational then $|h(x) -h(a)| =|g(x) - g(a)| < \epsilon$ and either way $|h(x) - h(a)| < \epsilon$. So $h$ is continuous at $a$.

But if $f(a)\ne g(a)$ then $|f(a)-g(a)| = c > 0$.

Lets assume $h$ is continuous at $a$. That would mean for the same $\epsilon, \delta_1, \delta_2$ above we would have a $\delta_3$ so that $|x-a|<\delta_3 \implies |h(x) - h(a)| < \epsilon$

Now for any interval, there exist a rational $x$ and an irrational $y$ so that $|x-a|<\min(\delta_1, \delta_2,\delta_3)$ and $|y-a| < \min(\delta_1, \delta_2,\delta_3)$.

But $c = |f(a) -g(a)| =$

$|[f(a)-f(x)] + [f(x) - g(y)] +[g(y)-g(a)]| =$

$|[f(a)-f(x)] + [h(x) - h(y)] +[g(y)-g(a)]| \le $

$|f(a)-f(x)| + |h(x)-h(y)| + |g(y) - g(a)| <$

$\epsilon + |[h(x) -h(a)]+[h(a)-h(y)] + \epsilon \le$

$2\epsilon + |h(x)-h(a)| + |h(y)-h(a)|< $

$2\epsilon + \epsilon+\epsilon = 4\epsilon$.

So $\epsilon > \frac c4 > 0$. Which contradicts that $\epsilon$ can be arbitrarily small.

So $h$ is not continuous at $a$ if $f(a)\ne g(a)$.

......

You correctly figured that $f\circ g(x) = 1-|x-1|$ which is continuous by, as you say, composition of continuous functions.

And you correctly figured that $(g\circ f)(x) = \begin{cases} 1 - |x-1|,\ \text{if $x\in\Bbb Q$}\\ 1 + |x-1|),\ \text{if $x\in\Bbb R\setminus\Bbb Q$} \end{cases}$

So this is continuous at points $a$ where $1-|x-1| = 1 + |x-1|$ and discontinuous everywhere else.

Now $1-|x-1| = 1 + |x-1|\iff -|x-1|=|x-1|\iff x-1 = 0 \iff x = 1$.

So $g\circ f$ is continuous at $1$ and discontinuous everywhere else.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ That's an interesting approach. Thank you! $\endgroup$ – roman Jul 19 '19 at 13:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.