4
$\begingroup$

$$e^{3x-2}e^{-x}=4e, \ \text{round to the nearest thousandths}$$

I keep getting $x\approx2.884$ but the answer is $x\approx2.193$. What am I doing wrong? Here is my work:

\begin{align*} e^{3x-2}e^{-x}&=4e \\ e^{2x-2}&=4e \\ 2x-2\ln(e)&=\ln(4e) \\ 2x-2&=\ln(4e)\\ 2x&=\ln(4e)+2 \\ x&=\frac{\ln(4e)+2}{2} \\ x&\approx2.884 \end{align*}

I've tried looking at $e^{-x}$ as $\frac{1}{e^x}$ or calculating the exact value of some of the simpler natural logs, but I keep getting the same answer. I feel like the mistake I'm making is so ridiculously obvious but I'm just not seeing it.

UPDATE: I discovered my mistake was an error of notation. I did not properly include parentheses on the last step on my calculator, and therefore my calculator assumed I was computing $\frac{\ln(4)e+2}{2}$

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In my calculator, $(\ln(4e) + 2) / 2$ is approximately $2.193$. I don't see any mistake in your calculation. $\endgroup$ – paulinho Jul 13 at 2:43
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In your third line of computation, you presumably mean $(2x-2)\ln(\mathrm{e})$? $\endgroup$ – Xander Henderson Jul 13 at 2:43
  • $\begingroup$ @XanderHenderson He/she could have meant that, but it's possible he could have meant what he/she wrote. Nonetheless, it doesn't matter. $\endgroup$ – paulinho Jul 13 at 2:45
  • $\begingroup$ I probably should utilize parentheses more often, but yes that is what I meant. It doesn't make much of a difference though, considering $\ln (e)=1$. $\endgroup$ – Lex_i Jul 13 at 2:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How do you get $\frac {\ln 4e + 2}2 = 2.884$? $e = 2.7183$ and $4e = 10.8732$ and $\ln 4e = 2.3863$ and $\frac {\ln 4e + 2}2 = 2.1932$. But you should have done $\ln 4e = \ln 4 + \ln e = \ln 4 + 1$. And $\ln 4 = 1.386$. $\endgroup$ – fleablood Jul 13 at 2:53
5
$\begingroup$

The calculation (last step) step is wrong.

$$ x = \frac{\ln(4e) + 2}{2} = \frac{\ln 2^{2} + \ln e + 2}{2} = \frac{2\ln 2 + 3}{2} = \ln 2 + \frac{3}{2} \approx 2.193 $$

(Also, you should have used parentheses the third step down.)

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

As indicated by the third line of your computation, you were careless with your parentheses. What you computed is $$ \frac{\ln(4)\cdot\mathrm{e} + 2}{2} \approx 2.884. $$ My guess is that what you typed into the calculator was something like

 ( ln 4 * e + 2 ) / 2

or possibly

 ln 4 * e + 2 / 2

depending on what calculator or computer program you are using.

Your first edit also does not fix the issue. Your calculator was not assuming that you meant $$ \frac{\ln(4\mathrm{e} + 2)}{2} \approx 2.996. $$ What you meant to calculate was $$ \frac{\ln(4\mathrm{e}) + 2}{2} \approx 2.193. $$ On most calculators, this would be something like

 ( ln ( 4 * e ) + 2 ) / 2

Parentheses matter. Be careful with them.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.