# An idealized $\infty$-body problem: is an infinite and regular configuration of massive objects stable?

Suppose I have an infinite amount of massive point shaped objects, and I arrange the objects by putting one object on each point of $$\mathbb{Z}^2$$ within $$\mathbb{R}^2$$. By symmetry, the gravity exerted on every object should add up to zero, so that nothing should happen to the system. Now suppose that I slightly perturb one of the objects. Will the resulting system collapse or will it stabilise?

There are obvious generalisations involving either higher dimensions or other kinds of regular configurations, and I'd be happy to hear more about that too, but for now let's restrict to the simplest situation stated above. Also, feel free to alter the tags, as I wasn't sure where to put this.

• In regard to 3D spaces. The speed of Newtonian gravitational forces is normally assumed to be infinite, with the age of the universe, expansion properties, etc., left unspecified. However this simple scenario leads to physical/mathematical difficulties in terms of gravity when considering an infinite 3D universe containing infinitely many dispersed objects. For example not being able to obtain a finite valued gravitational potential function mapping to all points in 3D space. – James Arathoon Jul 13 at 17:18

I believe this argument can be extended to particles in 2D by considering them to lie in $$\mathbb R^2\times\{0\}$$ -- one just has to show that the potential is still not a local minimum when restricted to the plane.
Suppose you slightly move one of the masses, say the one lying at $$(0,0)$$, along $$x$$ axis in the positive direction. Then all distances from that mass to any mass with $$x>0$$ decrease, while all distances from that mass to any mass with $$x\le0$$ increase. The result is a net force along $$x$$ in the positive direction, leading to instability of the system.