I am learning the strong maximum principle by following Evan's Partial differential equations. It is stated as follows: Let $U$ be an open subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ and $T>0$. Let $u=u(x,t)$, where $x=(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\in\Omega$ and $0\leq t\leq T$. Denote $\partial_t$ the partial derivative wrt $t$ and $\Delta_x=\sum_{i=1}^n\partial_{x_i}^2$ the Laplacian on the variables $x_i$.

Theorem 4(b) (page 55) of Evan's book states, in equivalent terms

Theorem (strong maximum principle for heat equation): Suppose that

  • $U$ is connected;
  • $u$ is $C^2$ on the variables $x_i$, and $C^1$ on the variable $t$, on $U\times(0,T]$, and continuous on all of $\overline{U}\times [0,T]$;
  • (the heat equation) $$\partial_t u=\Delta_x u\quad\text{on}\quad U\times (0,T)$$
  • There exists $x_0\in U$ such that $u(x_0,T)=\sup u(U\times([0,T]))$

Then $u$ is contant of $\overline{U}\times[0,T]$.

My question is: Does the analogous result hold if we assume instead that $u$ attains its maximum at a point $(x_0,t_0)$, where $0<t_0<T$?

My guess is that this is not the case: If there is a nonzero solution $v$ of the heat equation on some square $U\times[0,T]$ which satisfies $v=0$ when $t=0$, then we can glue the constant function $0$ on $U\times[0,t_0]$ with $w(x,t)=v(x,t-t_0)$ when $t\geq t_0$, and hope that the resulting function is sufficiently regular. However we should not have any good boundedness assumptions on $v$ to avoid all those uniqueness theorems for solutions of the heat equation..


You are right. If $u$ attains its maximum at $(x_0,t_0)$, then you can only conclude that $u$ must be constant up to that time-point, i.e. in $\bar{U}_{t_0}$. Beyond $t_0$, the function may change value before reaching the final time $T$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.