Is there a continuous transformation that does NOT preserve zero measure?

I found one of my textbooks claims that a continuous transformation in $\mathbb R^n$ preserves zero measure. But I am highly skeptical about it.

In fact, I can only see the case when the transformation is actually Lipschitz, like in this post. But in general, I am struggling in finding a counterexample. Any help?


The map $\sum \frac {2a_n} {3^{n}} \to \sum \frac {a_n} {2^{n}}$ ($a_n \in \{0,1\}$ for all $n$) is a continuous map from the Cantor set $C$ onto $[0,1]$. This map extends to a continuous function on $\mathbb R$ since its vales at the end points of the intervals removed in the construction of $C$ are equal). This extended function is called the Cantor function.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.