I am a little confused as to what the difference between the pre-image and the inverse of a function are and how to find each given a particular function ( I had though they were essentially the same thing but I realise now I was mistaken in that thought ).

From Wikipedia the definitions given are :


Let $f$ be a function whose domain is the set $X$, and whose image (range) is the set $Y$. Then $f$ is invertible if there exists a function $g$ with domain $Y$ and image $X$, with the property: $f ( x ) = y \iff g ( y ) = x . $ If $f$ is invertible, the function $g$ is unique, which means that there is exactly one function $g$ satisfying this property (no more, no less). That function $g$ is then called the inverse of $f$, and is usually denoted as $f ^{−1}$


Let $f$ be a function from $X$ to $Y$. The preimage or inverse image of a set $B\subseteq Y$ under $f$ is the subset of $X$ defined by $f ^{− 1 }[ B ] = \{ x \in X \mid f ( x ) \in B \}$.

So using an example I want to see if I have this about right ( please correct any mistakes I make)

Example 1:

Lets say $f:\Bbb R \rightarrow \Bbb R$


For this example, clearly $f$ cannot be invertible (hence no inverse) as there exists no function $g$ which will satisfy $ f ( x ) = y \iff g ( y ) = x$. (as it would only map to positive values of $\Bbb R$ (i.e. not the whole set))

The pre-image of this function I believe is related to the inverse except it does not require that we map to the whole set $\Bbb R$, but rather just a subset of it. Therefore we can find the function $f^{-1}$ in an analogous way to to finding the inverse we just have to be more considerate about what the co-domain of this function is.

So if $f(x)=x^2 \Rightarrow y=x^2 $swap variables to get $x=y^2 \Rightarrow \sqrt{x}=y=f^{-1} $

So the pre-image is the set $f ^{− 1 }[ \Bbb R_+ ] = \{ x \in X \mid f ( x ) \in \Bbb R_+, f^{-1}=\sqrt{x} \} $

Example 2:

An example of an invertible function would be $f:\Bbb R \rightarrow \Bbb R$

$f(x)=5x$, as a function $g(x)=x/5$ has domain $\Bbb R$ and range $\Bbb R$ and satisfies $f ( x ) = y ⇔ g ( y ) = x .$

The pre-image in this case will be equal to the inverse.

Could anyone please explain to me any mistakes I'm making here ?

  • $\begingroup$ For starters, they are two very different objects. The pre-image of a function is a subset of the domain and the inverse function is a function from the range back to the domain that satisfies certain properties. A function may not be invertible but we can always talk about pre-image of a function. $\endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Jul 7, 2019 at 20:58
  • $\begingroup$ @AnuragA I know now that they are not the same thing , I was just wondering if I was correct in identifying how they are different $\endgroup$
    – excalibirr
    Jul 7, 2019 at 21:00
  • $\begingroup$ No, one peaks in almost all cases of the preimage of a subset of the target space. Take, for instance, the squaring function $f(x)=x^2$, and ask for the preimage of the set of odd numbers. Then this will be the set of all $\pm\sqrt{2k+1}$, with $k$ running through all integers. If one were to speak of the “preimage of a function”, presumably that would be the preimage of the whole target space, which is all of the domain of definition of the function. $\endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Jul 7, 2019 at 21:09

3 Answers 3


The biggest difference between a preimage and the inverse function is that the preimage is a subset of the domain. The inverse (if it exists) is a function between two sets.

In that sense they are two very different animals. A set and a function are completely different objects.

So for example: The inverse of a function $f$ might be: The function $g:\mathbb R \to \mathbb R: g(x) = \sqrt[3]{x-9}$. Whereas the preimage of a set $B$ of the function might be $[1,3.5)\cup \{e, \pi^2\}$.

Now $g(x) = \sqrt[3]{x-9}$ and $[1,3.5)\cup \{7, \pi^2\}$ are completely different types of things.

This will be the case if $f$ is $f:\mathbb R \to \mathbb R: f(x) = x^3 + 9$ and $B= [10, 51.875) \cup \{352, \pi^6 + 9\}$.

The inverse $f^{-1}(x)$ (if it exist) is the function $g$ so that if $f(x) = y$ if and only if $g(y) = x$. So if $f(x) = x^3 + 9 = y$ then if such a function exists it must be that $g(y)^3 + 9 = y$ so $g(y)^3 = y-9$ and $g(y) = \sqrt[3]{y-9}$ so $g(x) = \sqrt[3]{x-9}$.

That's that.

The pre-image of $A= [10, 51.875) \cup \{352, \pi^6 + 9\}$ is the set $\{x\in \mathbb R| f(x) \in [10, 51.875) \cup \{352, \pi^6 + 9\}\}=$

$\{x\in \mathbb R| x^3 + 9 \in [10, 51.875) \cup \{352, \pi^6 + 9\}\}=$

$\{x\in \mathbb R| x^3 \in [1, 42.875) \cup \{343, \pi^6 \}\}=$

$\{x\in \mathbb R| x \in [1, 3.5) \cup \{7, \pi^2 \}\}=$

$[1, 3.5) \cup \{7, \pi^2 \}\}$.

And that's the other.


Now that's not to say the inverse of a function and the pre-image of a set under the function aren't related. They are. But they refer to different concepts. This is similar to how a rectangle and its area are related. But one is a geometric shape... the other is a positive real number. THey are two different types of animals.


I'll add more in an hour or so but I have to take the dog for a walk. I'll be back.


It occurred to me as I was walking the dog that maybe what is confusing you is that the inverse function (if it exists) and the preimage of a set have very similar notation and the only way to tell them apart is in context.

If $f$ is invertible then the inverse function is written as $f^{-1}$ so if $f(x) = x^3 + 9$ then $f^{-1}(x) = \sqrt[3]{x-9}$.

But the preimage of $B$ under $f$ whether $f$ is invertible or or not is writen as $f^{-1}(B)$.

So if $f(x) = x^3 + 9$ then $f^{-1}(17) = 2$ means that if you enter $17$ into the function $\sqrt{x -9}$ you get $2$. But $f^{-1}(\{17\})=\{3\}$ and $f^{-1}(\{36,17\}) = \{2,3\}$ means that set of values that will output $\{17\}$ is the set $\{2\}$ and the set of values that will output $\{36,17\}$ is the set $\{2,3\}$.

A few things to note:

If $f$ is invertible then the preimage of a set is the same thing as the image of the set under the inverse function and that means the notation is compatible.

If $f(x) = x^3 + 9$ then $f^{-1}([1,36)) = [1,3)$ can be interpretated as both the the image of the set under the inverse function: $f^{-1}([1,36))= \{f^{-1}(x) = g(x) = \sqrt[3]{x-9}| x\in [1,36)\}$

OR it can be interpreted as the preimage for $f$: $f^{-1}([1,36)) = \{x\in \mathbb R| f(x) \in [1,36)\}$.

but this is not the case if $f$ is not invertible.

Say $f:\mathbb R \to [-1,1]; f(x)\to \sin x$. This is not invertible.

The pre-image of$B= \{\frac {\sqrt 2}2\}$ is $\{...-\frac {11\pi}4, -\frac {9\pi}4,-\frac{3\pi}4,-\frac \pi 4, \frac \pi 4, \frac {3\pi}4, \frac {9\pi}4, \frac {11\pi}4,....\}$ this is still written as $f^{-1}( \{\frac {\sqrt 2}2\})$ even though there is no function $f^{-1}:[-1,1]\to \mathbb R$.

Another thing to note is that not all the elements in $B$ have to have pre-image values.

If $f= x^2+9$ then $f^{-1}(\{8\}) = \emptyset$. This is because $\{x\in \mathbb R| f(x) = x^2 + 9 \in \{8\}\} = \emptyset$.

And some elements may have many preimages.

And $\sin^{-1}(\{\frac {\sqrt2} 2}$ showed.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for such a brilliantly comprehensive answer :) there's literally nothing else I could think to ask . $\endgroup$
    – excalibirr
    Jul 15, 2019 at 7:34
  • $\begingroup$ Actually , I did manage to think of question lol, (it's in the context of continuity in topology) say we have the function $f=x^2$ and a basis set $(-q,q), q \in \Bbb Q$ in our target. then I know that $f^{-1}((-q,q))=\{ x \in X| x\in (-\sqrt{q}, \sqrt{q})\}$ but why isn't it $(\sqrt{-q}, \sqrt{q})$ instead ?, also say we have the set (a,b) (a<b) with the same function then is $f^{-1}=(-\sqrt{b},-\sqrt{a}) \cup (\sqrt{a},\sqrt{b})$ ? $\endgroup$
    – excalibirr
    Jul 15, 2019 at 9:28

When we talk about pre-image then it has two components: a set and a function. So when we say $f^{-1}[B]$, then we want the pre-image of the set $B$ (a subset of the co-domain) under the function $f$. So asking about pre-image of a function is a bit ambiguous.

Let us consider $f:\{1,2,3\} \rightarrow \{a,b,c\}$ such that $f(1)=a, f(2)=a$ and $f(3)=c$. Then \begin{align*} f^{-1}\left[\{a\}\right] & =\{1,2\}\\ f^{-1}\left[\{c\}\right] & =\{3\}\\ f^{-1}\left[\{a,c\}\right] & =\{1,2,3\}\\ f^{-1}\left[\{b\}\right] & =\emptyset\\ f^{-1}\left[\{a,b,c\}\right] & =\{1,2,3\} \end{align*}

The function $f$ (as described above) is not invertible. So relating the inverse function (which doesn't exist) to the inverse image is meaningless in this case.

One can check invertibility of a function $f: A \rightarrow B$ by checking the inverse images of singleton subsets of the co-domain.

What it means is that: if we can ensure that for every $b \in B$, the inverse image set $f^{-1}\left[\{b\}\right]$ has exactly one element (this is to ensure both one-one and ontoness), then $f$ is invertible.


So, there's no such thing as the preimage of a function. Functions can have inverses; functions do not have preimages.

An inverse is something that certain functions have, and the inverse of a function is another function.

Given a function, a preimage is something that sets have, and the preimage of a set is another set.


Given a function $f : A \to B$, that function may or may not have an inverse. If it does, then that inverse is a function $B \to A$.

Given a function $f : A \to B$, and a set $s$ which is a subset of $B$, that set always has a preimage under $f$. That preimage is a subset of $A$.

That might clear up some of your confusion.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.