2
$\begingroup$

I am working through a question in Guillemin and Pollacks Differential topology. Similar questions to this have been asked here before ( Natural projection of tangent bundle is submersion), (Natural projection of tangent bundle is submersion). I understand how these suggested solutions work. However when I attempted the question I had a different approach and correct my attempt to help improve my understanding.

Question (1.8.5): Prove that the projection map $p:T(X)\rightarrow X$, $p(x,v)=x$ is a submersion.

Attempt: Let $X$ be a manifold in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Then its tangent bundle $T(X)$ is a manifold in $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$. Consider the projection map $\pi:\mathbb{R}^{2n}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$, $(x_1,\ldots,x_n,\ldots,x_{2n})\mapsto (x_1,\ldots,x_n)$. We claim that this is a submersion. Note that for any $p\in \mathbb{R}^{2n}$, $T_p(\mathbb{R}^{2n})=\mathbb{R}^{2n}$ and $T_{\pi(p)}(\mathbb{R}^{n})=\mathbb{R}^n$. Hence $d\pi_p:\mathbb{R}^{2n}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$. This is clearly surjective since for any $h\in \mathbb{R}^{2n}$, $d\pi_p(h)=\pi(h)$, hence $\pi$ is a sumbersion.

Part that I am unsure about: Since $p$ is the restriction of $\pi$ to $T(x)$ it must also be that $p$ is a submersion. I think this is true for submanifolds? But is it enought to say that since $T(X)$ is a manifold and a subset of $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$, then it is a submanifold of $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The question id local, if $X$ is a $p$-dimensional manifold, each element $x$ of $X$ has a neighborhood $U_x$ diffeomorphic to an open subset of $\mathbb{R}^p$, you deduce that $TU_{x}=U_{x}\times \mathbb{R}^p$ and the restriction of $p$ to $U$ is the projection $U_x\times \mathbb{R}^p\rightarrow U_x$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I am confused by "The question id local," could you explain that a bit more please. $\endgroup$
    – T. Stark
    Commented Jun 30, 2019 at 13:56
  • $\begingroup$ If you mean that the question is to show at at each point, that $p$ is a sumbersion then your answer is very similar to (math.stackexchange.com/questions/1890209/…) which I understand. Could you explain errors/miss understandings in my attempt instead of giving an entirely different solution please? Thank you for your answer though, I appreciate your help and do not mean to come across as rude. $\endgroup$
    – T. Stark
    Commented Jun 30, 2019 at 14:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .