0
$\begingroup$

How do I see that for a $K$-vector space $V$ the map

$\bigwedge^d(V^*) \times \bigwedge^d(V) \rightarrow K, (f_1 \wedge ... \wedge f_d, x_1 \wedge ... \wedge x_d) \mapsto det(f_i(x_i)_{i,j})$

is bilinear?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The problem is to show / know it is welll defined. If we know that the result is obvious, we have linearity in first variable $f=(f_1,f_2,\dots,f_d)$ (well, the map factors through the wedge product if it is well defined) since the determinant is multillinear w.r..t to its rows/columns,. The same with $x= (x_1,x_2,\dots, x_d)$ instead of $f$. $\endgroup$ – dan_fulea Jun 26 at 22:17
  • $\begingroup$ @dan_fulea Then how do I show well-definedness? $\endgroup$ – Chaser01 Jun 26 at 22:26
2
$\begingroup$

I try to write an answer that should clear the definition of the map in the OP. By definition, it is a (multi)linear map. The main instrument is using "universality" when working with elements in the category of vector spaces and (multi)linear applications. (This would not fit as a comment, and it would be hard to type without markup control.)

(1) Let us fix some field $K$ (of characteristic $\ne 2$, or maybe even $=0$ to exclude any problems with the definition of the wedge space).

We work in the category of vector spaces over $V$.

Functorially, if $f,g$ are (linear) maps $V\to V'$ and $W\to W'$, then $f\otimes g$ is a (bi)linear map $V\times W\to V'\times W'$. Same is valid for more tensor factors.

(2) Consider now "the $V$" from the OP. We have an evaluation map $V^*\otimes V\to K$.

Using it we can define for a fixed pair $(i_0,j_0)$ the map $$ \left(\times_{i=1}^dV^*\right)\ \otimes\ \left(\times_{j=1}^dV\right) \to K\ , $$ $$ (f_1,f_2,\dots,f_d)\otimes(x_1,x_2,\dots,x_d) \to f_{i_0}(x_{j_0})\ . $$

(3) Putting together all the above maps for all possible values of $(i_0, j_0)$, so that the image space is a space of matrices $d\times d$, we have a map By repeating it in $d$ tensor parts, we also have a map: $$ \left(\times_{i=1}^dV^*\right)\ \otimes\ \left(\times_{j=1}^dV\right) \to M_{d\times d}(K)\ , $$ $$ (f_1,f_2,\dots,f_d)\otimes(x_1,x_2,\dots,x_d) \to \Big[\ f_{i_0}(x_{j_0})\ \Big]_{1\le i_0,j_0\le d}\ . $$ As it is so far, this map is linear (in each component), but it is not "balanced", i.e. we cannot move a scalar from one $f$-component to an other one, or from an $x$-component to an other one.

(4) Consider now the composition $$ \left(\times_{i=1}^dV^*\right)\ \otimes\ \left(\times_{j=1}^dV\right) \to M_{d\times d}(K) \overset\det\longrightarrow K\ . $$ This composition is now balanced by the properties of the determinant. For instance, $(af_1,f_2,\dots,f_d)\otimes x$ and/or $f\otimes(ax_1,x_2,\dots,x_d)$ is mapped via (3) to the matrix obtained from the one for $f\otimes x=(f_1,f_2,\dots,f_d)\otimes (x_1,x_2,\dots,x_d)$ by multiplying the first matrix row/column with the scalar $a\in K$.

Applying the $\det$, $a$ becomes now a factor of the result.

The same computation can be done when $a$ is on an other component position of $f$ and/or of $x$.

So the balancing properties is valid after applying $\det$.

(5) The balancing implies we have an induced map $\bar\Phi$: $$ \bar\Phi\ :\ \left(\bigotimes_{i=1}^dV^*\right)\ \otimes\ \left(\bigotimes_{j=1}^dV\right) \to K\ . $$ On elements $f_1\otimes f_2\otimes\dots\otimes f_d$ algebraically tensored with $x_1\otimes x_2\otimes\dots\otimes x_d$ it is defined by lifting this to (linear combinations of) $(f_1,f_2,\dots,f_3)\otimes(x_1,x_2,\dots,x_d)$ and applying $\Phi$ (followed by linear assembly).

The result does not depend on the lifts. Every relation that has to be tested for $\bar\phi$ has an equivalent pendant at the level of $\Phi$.

(6) It remains to observe that $\bar\Phi$ is alternating in its $f$-components, and also in its $x$-components. We only need to show this at the level of $\Phi$.

So we have to compare first the result of applying $\Phi$ on the elements

$(\color{blue}{f_1,f_2},\dots,f_d)\otimes(x_1,x_2,\dots,x_d)$ and respectively

$(\color{blue}{f_2,f_1},\dots,f_d)\otimes(x_1,x_2,\dots,x_d)$

(and on all other cases of a change implemented by a transposition of two indices).

We apply $\Phi$ on the above two elements, the intermediate matrix station delivers two matrices with interchanged first and second rows, further applying $\det$ leads to a sign difference. In this case and in the other cases of using a transposition of indices of the $f$-component

This shows the alternating relation for the $f$-components.

The similar argument applied for the comparison of $\Phi$-values on

$(f_1,f_2,\dots,f_d)\otimes(\color{blue}{x_1,x_2},\dots,x_d)$ and respectively

$(f_1,f_2,\dots,f_d)\otimes(\color{blue}{x_2,x_1},\dots,x_d)$

and on the values in the more general case, when we are using a transposition $(j_1,j_2)$ instead of $(1,2)$ as above,

is leading to the comparison of two determinants with matrices two exchanged columns, and again we deduce the alternation relation, this time on the $x$-components.

(7) We can thus factorize through the wedge-product, getting a final map $\hat\Phi$: $$ \hat\Phi\ :\ \left(\wedge_{i=1}^dV^*\right)\ \otimes\ \left(\wedge_{j=1}^dV\right) \to K\ . $$ (The wedge product can be realized in characteristic zero either als subobject, or as a quotient of the tensor product. The factorization makes sense when the quotient is taken, and the map is already alternating.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for this detailed answer, it really helps a lot! But this map is defined on $\bigwedge^d(V^*) \otimes \bigwedge^d(V)$ instead of $\bigwedge^d(V^*) \times \bigwedge^d(V)$, isn't it? $\endgroup$ – Chaser01 Jun 27 at 15:20
3
$\begingroup$

The given formula is certainly giving a well defined mapping $$\varphi:V^*\times\dots\times V^*\ \times\ V\times\dots\times V \longrightarrow K$$ Fixing all but one arguments makes the matrix of the determinant varying linearly in one row or column.
This shows that $\varphi$ is multilinear, so that it factors through $$V^*\otimes\dots\otimes V^*\ \otimes\ V\otimes\dots\otimes V \longrightarrow K$$ Finally, if $f_i=f_j$ [or $x_i=x_j$] with $i\ne j$, the matrix of the determinant will have two identical rows [columns], which shows that restricting to the first [second] $d$ variables gives an alternating multilinear map, and hence it factors through $$(V^*\land\dots\land V^*)\ \otimes\ (V\land\dots\land V)\ .$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much, that helps me a lot! Just one question: I was searching for a map from the Cartesian product of $\bigwedge)V^*)$ and $\bigwedge)V)$ instead of one from their tensor product, how can we fix that? $\endgroup$ – Chaser01 Jun 27 at 11:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ We have the following sequence: $(\times^d V^*)\times(\times^d V) \ \to\ (\otimes^d V^*) \times(\otimes^d V) \ \to\ (\otimes^d V^*) \otimes(\otimes^d V) \ \to\ (\land^d V^*) \otimes(\land^d V) \ \to\ K$. $\endgroup$ – Berci Jun 27 at 18:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ahh you rather want this line: $(\otimes^d V^*) \times(\otimes^d V) \ \to\ (\land^d V^*) \times(\land^d V) \ \to\ (\land^d V^*) \otimes(\land^d V)\ \to \ K$. $\endgroup$ – Berci Jun 27 at 18:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.