It has been my understanding that if there exist for an ODE in the form $M(x,\ y)\ dx + N(x,\ y)\ dy = 0$ integrating factors that depend only on $x$, then the formula $u(x) = e^{-\int \frac{2D=curl\begin{bmatrix}M \\ N\end{bmatrix}}{N}\ dx}$ will find at least some of them. Likewise, if there exist integrating factors that depend only on $y$, then the formula $u(y) = e^{\int \frac{2D=curl\begin{bmatrix}M \\ N\end{bmatrix}}{M}\ dy}$ should find at least some of them. For example, just before introducing the above formulas, my book notes

$\frac{\partial}{\partial y}(uM) = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(uN)$ This is a partial differential equation for $u$. There is no procedure for solving this equation in general. However, sometimes we can make assumptions about $u$ that make this equation simpler...If there is an integrating factor that depends on only one variable, is it much easier to find.

variable names changed for consistency

However, I appear to have come across a counterexample; $(\frac{2y + 8}{x})\ dx + (2 + \frac{7}{x})\ dy = 0$ clearly has at least the integrating factor $u(x) = x$, but the above $u(x)$ formula leads to a mixed integral obstacle.

Is the above a correct principle? Is the mistake in my theory or calculations?


1 Answer 1


Note that you need to find $$u(x) = e^{\int \frac {M_y-N_x}{N}} .$$

$$(\frac{2y + 8}{x})\ dx + (2 + \frac{7}{x})\ dy = 0 $$

$$M_y=2/x , N_x=-7/{x^2}$$

$$ u(x) =e^{\int \frac {M_y-N_x}{N}}= e^{\int \frac {1}{x}dx } = e^{\ln x}=x $$

Thus there is no confusion about the formula or computation.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.