1
$\begingroup$

Why if the columns of a matrix are orthogonal, then $AA^T\neq A^TA=I$? I know this isn't true if the columns are orthonormal, but since $A^TA=I$, then $A^T=A^{-1}$, and if exists the left inverse, then exists the right inverse such that $AA^{T}=I$. Am I missing something?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $A$ doesn't have to be square to have orthogonal columns. So $A^TA = I$ doesn't necessarily imply that $A$ is invertible. $\endgroup$ – Matthew Leingang Jun 12 at 14:29
  • $\begingroup$ What if we deal only with square matrices? $\endgroup$ – Jonathan S. Jun 12 at 14:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ With orthogonal columns, you only have $A^TA$ diagonal, so you don't have $A^TA=I$. $\endgroup$ – user10354138 Jun 12 at 14:41
  • $\begingroup$ The problem arises as I saw this in a question: "Now, if you work out what it means for the columns of $𝐴$ to be orthogonal, then that comes out as $𝐴^𝑇𝐴=𝐼_𝑛$. And, the rows of $𝐴$ are orthogonal if and only if $𝐴𝐴^𝑇=𝐼_𝑛$" math.stackexchange.com/a/2250266/268627 $\endgroup$ – Jonathan S. Jun 12 at 14:49
  • $\begingroup$ @JonathanS. I don't see how that conflicts with anything said in the comment section here. If we deal with square matrices, then $A^TA=I$ and $AA^T=I$ are equivalent, and neither can happen without the other. $\endgroup$ – Arthur Jun 12 at 15:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.