0
$\begingroup$

Let $(\mathbb{R}^2,d)$ be a metric space, where $d$ is the Euclidean metric on $\mathbb{R}^2$. Let $\kappa$ denote the set of compact subsets of $R^2$. Which one of the following expression defines a metric on $\kappa$

  1. $d_1(K_1,K_2) = \inf_{x \in K_1} \inf_{y\in K_2} d(x,y)$

  2. $d_2(K_1,K_2) = \inf_{x\in K_1} \sup_{y\in K_2} d(x,y)$

  3. $d_3(K_1,K_2) = \sup_{x\in K_1} \inf_{y\in K_2} d(x,y)$

  4. none of the above.

I know the definition of distance between two sets $d(A,B) = \inf \{d(x,y) : x \in A,y \in B \}$ and $d(A,B)= 0$ if $A\cap B \neq \emptyset $ ; also, $d(A,B) = 0$ is possible, even if $A\cap B = \emptyset$.

Example Let $X = \{ \frac{1}{n} : n\in \mathbb{N} \}$. Let $A =\{ \frac{1}{2n} : n \in \Bbb N \}$ and $B = \{ \frac{1}{2n-1} : n \in \Bbb N \}$; in this case $A\cap B =\emptyset$. I'm not able to define the metric on compact sets. Can someone help me

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Example of what? A and B are not compact. $\endgroup$ Jun 9 '19 at 11:26
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, A and B are not compact $\endgroup$
    – 800123
    Jun 9 '19 at 12:00
1
$\begingroup$

If $K_1 \subset K_2$ but $K_1 \neq K_2$ then $d_1(K_1,K_2)=d_3(K_1,K_2)=0$. Hence $d_1$ and $d_3$ are not metrics. [One of the requirements for a metric $d$ is $d(x,y)=0$ implies $x=y$]. Similarly, if we take $K_1=\{x\}$ and $K_2=\{x,y\}$ ($ y \neq x$) then $d_2(K_1,K_2)=0$. Hence none of the three are metrics.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.