where $H_n$ is the harmonic number and can be defined as:



I managed to prove $\quad\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-1)^nH_n^{(3)}}{n^2}=\frac{21}{32}\zeta(5)-\frac34\zeta(2)\zeta(3)\quad$ using logarithmic integral and couple harmonic identities. other approaches are much appreciated.

you can find a different solution by Cornel in his book (Almost impossible integrals, sum and series).

  • $\begingroup$ @ Ali Shather Over the last couple of weeks you have provided interesting results for special cases. What about explaining your general method and showing its capabiities in solving a class of problems, e.g. for $S(p,q) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^k H_{k}^{(p)}/k^q$ and answer questins such as "Which combinations of $,p$ and $q$ permit closed expressions?" and "What is new in these results?" $\endgroup$ – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze Jun 8 '19 at 16:40
  • $\begingroup$ @ Dr. Wolfgang Hintze thank you. actually I solved these sums over a year ago and I posted some of them on my facebook group ( harmonic series) but I've been posting them here lately as I've just learned LaTex. about your question, I know that Bastien derived the generalization for S(1,q) here arxiv.org/pdf/… where q is even. $\endgroup$ – Ali Shadhar Jun 8 '19 at 18:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ Dr. Wolfgang and couple days ago Cornel derived the generalization for S( p,1) here researchgate.net/publication/…. The generalization of S(p,q) is extremely hard and its not in the mathematical literature yet. I do not see myself good enough to investigate it and I am just focused on providing new solutions to particular cases. $\endgroup$ – Ali Shadhar Jun 8 '19 at 18:04
  • $\begingroup$ @ Ali Shather From the work of Bastien (thanks for the hint) I conclude that $S(1,5)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} (-1)^k \frac{H_{k}}{k^5}$ is the first sum which seems not to have a closed form (in terms). So this is a real challenge. $\endgroup$ – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze Jun 8 '19 at 21:56
  • $\begingroup$ @Dr.WolfgangHintze no problem. Yes it's pretty tough and that's why mathematicians still struggle with it. $\endgroup$ – Ali Shadhar Jun 8 '19 at 22:14

using the fact that $\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty z^nH_n^{(3)}=\frac{\operatorname{Li}_3(z)}{1-z}\ $ divide both sides by $z$ then integrate from $z=0$ to $x$, we get $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{x^nH_n^{(3)}}{n}=\operatorname{Li}_4(x)-\ln(1-x)\operatorname{Li}_3(x)-\frac12\operatorname{Li}_2^2(x)\tag{1}$$

replace $x$ with $-x$ in(1), then divide both sides by $x$ and integrate from $0$ to $1$, we get

\begin{align} \sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-1)^nH_n^{(3)}}{n^2}&=\operatorname{Li}_5(-1)-\underbrace{\int_0^1\frac{\ln(1+x)\operatorname{Li}_3(-x)}{x}\ dx}_{IBP}-\frac12\int_0^1\frac{\operatorname{Li}_2^2(-x)}{x}\ dx\\ &=\operatorname{Li}_5(-1)+\operatorname{Li}_2(-1)\operatorname{Li}_3(-1)-\frac32\int_0^1\frac{\operatorname{Li}_2^2(-x)}{x}\ dx\\ &=\frac38\zeta(2)\zeta(3)-\frac{15}{16}\zeta(5)-\frac32\int_0^1\frac{\operatorname{Li}_2^2(-x)}{x}\ dx\\ \end{align} I proved here \begin{align} \int_0^1\frac{\operatorname{Li}_2^2(-x)}{x}\ dx=\frac34\zeta(2)\zeta(3)-\frac{17}{16}\zeta(5) \end{align} which follows that



By setting $x=-1$ in (1) we have


| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.