I'm trying to evaluate the following integral using the residue theorem

\begin{align}\label{eq:int_1} S(z) = \dfrac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi} \dfrac{e^{i\phi}+z}{e^{i\phi}-z} e^{-\lambda\sin^{2}(\phi/2)} \mathrm d\phi \end{align} where $\lambda$ is a real positive parameter. Now here's my attempt which I'm pretty sure is incorrect. We can transform the above real integral into a contour integral over the unit circle using the substitution $w = e^{i\phi}$. First note that - \begin{align} \exp(-\lambda\sin^{2}(\phi/2)) &= \exp(-\lambda/2)\exp((\lambda/4)(e^{i\phi} + e^{-i\phi})) \\ &= \exp(-\lambda/2)\exp((\lambda/4)(w + 1/w)) \end{align}

Therefore the above integral now becomes -

$$S(z) = \dfrac{\exp(-\lambda/2)}{2\pi i}\oint_{\mathcal{C}} \dfrac{w+z}{w-z} \exp\bigg(\dfrac{\lambda}{4}\bigg(w + \dfrac{1}{w}\bigg)\bigg)\dfrac{\mathrm dw}{w} $$

The integrand has singularities at $w = z$ and $w = 0$ (I'm interested in the case when $|z|<1$) so we can evaluate the residues at both of these singularities and then employ the residue theorem. The residue at $w = z$ is found to be

$$2 \exp\bigg(\dfrac{\lambda}{4}\bigg(z + \dfrac{1}{z}\bigg)\bigg) $$

whereas to evaluate the residues at $w = 0$, we need to expand the exponential as a power series and keep only all those terms which possess a simple pole at $w=0$. Since

$$\exp\bigg(\dfrac{\lambda}{4}\bigg(w + \dfrac{1}{w}\bigg)\bigg)\dfrac{1}{w} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{n!}\bigg(\dfrac{\lambda}{4}\bigg)^{n}\dfrac{(w^2+1)^{n}}{w^{n+1}}$$ and from the binomial expansion we know that

$$(w^2+1)^{n} = \sum_{k=0}^{n} {n\choose k } w^{2k} $$

It's clear that only the terms with even n yield a simple pole since we must have $n=2k$. And I think finally the residue evaluates to a modified Bessel function of the form $ - I_{0}(\lambda/2)$ where the negative sign comes about from the $(w+z)/(w-z)$ part. And so we obtain

$$S(z) = \exp(-\lambda/2)\bigg( 2 \exp\bigg(\dfrac{\lambda}{4}\bigg(z + \dfrac{1}{z}\bigg)\bigg) - I_{0}(\lambda/2) \bigg)$$

But something seems to have gone wrong here since the above expression has a singularity at $z = 0$ whereas the original expression for the function is clearly finite at $z=0$. I'm really unsure where I've made the mistake. Any help is hugely appreciated. Thanks !!

  • $\begingroup$ Let $\lambda' = \lambda/2$. You're multiplying $$e^{\lambda' (w + 1/w)/2} = \sum_{k \in \mathbb Z} I_k(\lambda') w^k$$ by $$\frac {w + z} {w (w - z)} = -\frac 1 w - \frac 2 z \sum_{k \geq 0} \left( \frac w z \right)^k.$$ All terms from the second series contribute to the value of the residue. $S(z)$ is equal to $$2 e^{\lambda' (1 - z)^2/(2 z)} - e^{-\lambda'} I_0(\lambda') - 2 e^{-\lambda'} \sum_{k \geq 1} I_k(\lambda') z^{-k}.$$ $\endgroup$ – Maxim Jun 11 '19 at 14:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.