2
$\begingroup$

Suppose $H_1 \subset H_2$ are both Hilbert spaces with different inner products $(\cdot,\cdot)_{H_1}$ and $(\cdot,\cdot)_{H_2}$. Suppose also that $H_1$ is dense in $H_2$ and that the inclusion is continuous (as in case of Gelfand triple).

Now, $$\lVert h_2 \rVert_{H_2} = \sup_{h \in H_2, \lVert h \rVert_{H_2} = 1}|(h_2, h)|$$ is by definition almost.

Question: Is it true that $$\lVert h_2 \rVert_{H_2} = \sup_{h \in H_1, \lVert h \rVert_{H_1} = 1}|(h_2, h)|?$$

That is, can I take the supremum over a dense subspace?

(In a previous thread Norm of linear functional; can we take supremum over dense subset?, related to this question, I did not clarify the situation enough).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your description of the meaning of the question is misleading: for example, as in the inclusion $H^1\subset L^2$ that arises in the "Gelfand triple" stories, for example Levi-Sobolev space on a circle, the unit ball in $H^1$ is by far not dense in the unit ball in $L^2$. Often these inclusions are compact, so the image of the finer topology's unit ball much be much smaller than the unit ball in the coarser. $\endgroup$ – paul garrett Mar 11 '13 at 20:30
  • $\begingroup$ @paulgarrett I don't understand, I thought $H^1(M) \subset L^2(M) $is always compact and dense for compact manifolds $M$. $\endgroup$ – maximumtag Mar 11 '13 at 22:34
  • $\begingroup$ The map is compact, yes. The image of the unit ball from $H^1$ is pre-compact in $L^2$ in such cases, yes, and the image of $H^1$ in $L^2$ is dense, yes. But the sup of $\langle x,y\rangle_{L^2}$ with $|x|_{H^1}\le 1$ will be smaller than $|y|_{L^2}$ for typical $y$ in $L^2$. Nothing pathological or tricky about this, in fact. $\endgroup$ – paul garrett Mar 12 '13 at 0:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What is the inner product you are using inside the supremum? You might get better answers if you provide more information on the background of the question. $\endgroup$ – timur Mar 13 '13 at 3:18
3
+25
$\begingroup$

It is false. For example, let $H_1=H_2$ as sets and let $(\cdot,\cdot)_{H_2}=c^2(\cdot,\cdot)_{H_1}$ for some $c>0$. Then $$\sup_{h\in H_1,\|h\|_{H_1}=1}|(h_2,h)_{H_2}|=\sup_{h\in H_2,\|h\|_{H_2}=c}|(h_2,h)_{H_2}|=c\|h_2\|_{H_2}.$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. But in your example the norms are equivalent. If this is not true do you know if my desired result will hold? Eg. $H^1(\Omega) \subset L^2(\Omega).$ Indeed I don't need equality, a $\leq$ will do. $\endgroup$ – maximumtag Mar 11 '13 at 21:56
  • $\begingroup$ @maximumtag: It still does not hold, even if for $\le$, because if your result holds for some $(,)_{H_1}$, you can replace it with another equivalent inner product as given in my answer. $\endgroup$ – 23rd Mar 12 '13 at 2:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.