1
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be solvable Lie algebra. Lie’s theorem states, that adjoint representation is a homomorphism $\operatorname{ad}:\mathfrak{g}\to \mathfrak{t}$, where $\mathfrak{t}$ is an algebra of upper-triangular matrices. Let $\mathfrak{d}\subset\mathfrak{t}$ be a subalgebra of diagonal matrices.

Is it true, that $\mathfrak{g}$ is nilpotent iff $\operatorname{ad}^{-1}(\mathfrak{d})=Z(\mathfrak{g})$? In one direction it is exactly the Engel’s theorem, but I cannot find counter examples or proof for the other direction.

UPD I want to rephrase my question in an equivalent way. Is it true, that all solvable, but not nilpotent subalgebras of upper-triangular algebra contain nonzero diagonal elements?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ As to your "UPD": The upper triangular matrices with all zeroes on the diagonal form a nilpotent Lie algebra, and all subalgebras of nilpotent algebras are nilpotent. By contraposition, any non-nilpotent subalgebra of some upper-triangular matrices must contain at least one element with at least one non-zero entry on the diagonal. $\endgroup$ – Torsten Schoeneberg May 25 '19 at 5:29
  • $\begingroup$ But should it contain a diagonal matrix? $\endgroup$ – Boris Bilich May 25 '19 at 10:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No. $\lbrace \pmatrix{a&a&b\\0&0&0\\0&0&0}: a,b \in \Bbb C \rbrace$. However, that is not an adjoint representation; your update is not equivalent to the original question. $\endgroup$ – Torsten Schoeneberg May 25 '19 at 18:23
-1
$\begingroup$

Consider the non commutative algebra of dimension $2$ generated by $x,y$ defined by $[x,y]=x$.

The matrix of $ad_x$ in the basis $(x,y)$ is $\pmatrix{0&1\cr 0&0}$ the matrix of $ad_y$ is $\pmatrix{-1&0\cr 0&0}$. $ad_y$ is diagonal, but this Lie algebra is solvable and not nilpotent and $y$ is not in the center.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ My question is incorrect, because zentrum is always a subset of the preimage. I’ll change it. $\endgroup$ – Boris Bilich May 24 '19 at 12:01
  • $\begingroup$ So you’ve just proved the statement: “If $\mathfrak{g}$ is nilpotent then it’s adjoint representation has no diagonal elements, except zero”. And I am interested if it is true in the opposite direction. $\endgroup$ – Boris Bilich May 24 '19 at 12:05
  • $\begingroup$ @BorisBilich No, this is not true. The adjoint operators are all nilpotent, but still may have diagonal elements different from zero. $\endgroup$ – Dietrich Burde May 24 '19 at 18:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So there is no contradiction with my statement. The algebra is not nilpotent and $\operatorname{ad}^{-1}(\mathfrak{d})$ is not center. $\endgroup$ – Boris Bilich May 24 '19 at 19:06
  • $\begingroup$ Engel’s theorem states, that all operators of adjoint representation are nilpotent and the only nilpotent diagonal matrix is zero. $\endgroup$ – Boris Bilich May 24 '19 at 19:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.