0
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathbf{A}$ be a constant vector and $\mathbf{r}=x\,\mathbf{i}+y\,\mathbf{j}+z\,\mathbf{k}$, verify the following identities:

(i) $\nabla\cdot[(\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{r})\mathbf{A}]=2\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{A}$

(ii) $\nabla\times[(\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{r})\mathbf{A}]=2\mathbf{r}\times\mathbf{A}$

(iii) $\nabla\cdot(\mathbf{A}\times\mathbf{r})=0$

(iv) $(\mathbf{A}\times\nabla)\times\mathbf{r}=-2\mathbf{A}$.

in all these question when I use $\nabla$ with the constant vector $\mathbf{A}$ It should give me zero in all cases( div - grad - curl ) but when I come in question [iv] the answer is $2\mathbf{A}$ by using the triple cross product not calculating $\mathbf{A}\times\nabla = 0 $.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $\mathbf{r}$ is not a constant vector, and the differential operator $(\mathbf{A}\times\nabla)\times$ is acting on it. $\endgroup$ – user10354138 May 23 at 19:57
  • $\begingroup$ A is the constant vector not r $\endgroup$ – Omar Shawky May 23 at 19:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, $\nabla$ (or rather $(A\times\nabla)\times$) is acting on everything that comes after it, and in this case it is a nonconstant vector field $\mathbf{r}$. $\endgroup$ – user10354138 May 23 at 20:00
  • $\begingroup$ shouldn't i use the determent to calculate Ax∇ first due to the brackets ? $\endgroup$ – Omar Shawky May 23 at 20:01
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, and that give you a differential operator. $\endgroup$ – user10354138 May 23 at 20:01
1
$\begingroup$

You can't manipulate differential operators as if they are constant. In particular, you can't naively use the BAC-CAB identity because it switches the order around.

$\mathbf{A}\times\nabla$ is the vector-valued operator $$ \mathbf{i}\left(A_y\frac{\partial}{\partial z}-A_z\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\right) + \mathbf{j}\left(A_z\frac{\partial}{\partial x}-A_x\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\right) + \mathbf{k}\left(A_x\frac{\partial}{\partial y}-A_y\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right) $$ where $\mathbf{A}=A_x\,\mathbf{i}+A_y\,\mathbf{j}+A_z\,\mathbf{k}$. You take the cross product again with $\mathbf{r}$: \begin{align*} (\mathbf{A}\times\nabla)\times\mathbf{r} &=\mathbf{i}\left[(\mathbf{A}\times\nabla)_y\mathbf{r}_z-(\mathbf{A}\times\nabla)_z\mathbf{r}_y\right]\\ &\quad+\mathbf{j}\left[(\mathbf{A}\times\nabla)_z\mathbf{r}_x-(\mathbf{A}\times\nabla)_x\mathbf{r}_z\right]\\ &\quad+\mathbf{k}\left[(\mathbf{A}\times\nabla)_x\mathbf{r}_y-(\mathbf{A}\times\nabla)_y\mathbf{r}_x\right]\\ &=\mathbf{i}\left[\left(A_z\frac{\partial}{\partial x}-A_x\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\right)z-\left(A_x\frac{\partial}{\partial y}-A_y\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)y\right] +\dots\\ &=-2A_x\,\mathbf{i}-2A_y\,\mathbf{j}-2A_z\,\mathbf{k}\\ &=-2\mathbf{A}. \end{align*}

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.