I tried to find the question here, but I couldn't. I'm a bit puzzled by Sobolev embeddings at the moment.

In my lecture notes, I found the statement

"If $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ is bounded and open with $\partial \Omega \in C^1$, $1 \leq p < \infty$, $k,m \in \mathbb{N}_0$ with $m > k$, then the embedding $$ W^{m,p}(\Omega) \hookrightarrow C^k(\overline{\Omega})$$ is compact, if $m - \tfrac{d}{p} > k$."

In my case, I have $k = 0, \, p = 4, \, m = 1, d \leq 3$. So the first question is:

$1.)$ From this theorem, I could conclude that functions in $W^{1,4}(\Omega)$ can be identified by functions in $C^0(\overline{\Omega})$, right? Because if I understand it correctly, this would imply, that I can always find a bounded representant in $W^{1,4}(\Omega)$.

But now I am puzzled, because the book where I wanted to refresh my knowledge about Sobolev Spaces says, that it is not possible to have a continous embedding of the form $$ W^{m,p}(\Omega) \hookrightarrow C^0(\Omega).$$ (The book gives with $d = 2$ the function $u(x) = \log(\log|x|)$ as example, but I didn't understand that completely yet.)

$2.)$ If this statement is true, why does the embedding work if I take the closure of $\Omega$?

Thank you!


Since you have not received an answer yet, I thought I would share my thoughts on this.

The theorem you cite is correct. It´s statement and proof can be found in Adams, Sobolev Spaces, Theorem 6.2 Part III.

Furthermore, for $\Omega \subset R^{n}$ open, bounded by a sufficiently smooth boundary and $mp > n, \; j\ge0$ we have the (compact) imbedding:

$ W^{j+m,p}(\Omega) \subset \subset C_{B}^{j}(\Omega)$ - this is Part II in the above theorem.

I am not familiar with the counterexample you provided, but I can assure you that for $p > n$ and sufficiently regular $\Omega$, we have $ W^{1,p}(\Omega) \rightarrow C^{0,\gamma}(\Omega)$ - the latter being a Holder space.

A bounded set of Holder-continous functions can always be extended (holder-continousely) to the boundary of $\Omega$ - this of course is not true in general for continous functions! We can then use the Arzela-Ascoli-theorem to show compactness in $C^{0}(\bar \Omega)$, because in any such chain of (continous) imbeddings, it is always sufficient that only one of them is compact for the hole chain to be compact.

I hope this helps a bit, take a look at the section in Adams and you will probably find more answers.


Thank you so much for your answer!

I actually managed to resolve my confusion. When calculating the given example in the book, one comes to a point where the decisive question is: Is $$ \int_0^a \frac{r}{(r \log(r))^p} \, \mathrm{d} r < \infty$$ for $a < 1$.

But this integral is only finite if $p \leq 2$, so actually the counterexample in the book holds only if $p \leq d$ without stating that at any point.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ those are known to be Bertran integral $\endgroup$ – Guy Fsone May 27 at 12:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.